Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Dublin using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We stack your running times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you measure up. This chart breaks it down, showing whether you were blazing fast, cruising steady, or losing pace.
It’s all about finding out if your running strategy matched your overall finish time!
We pit your station times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you stack up. This chart shows if you crushed it, coasted, or found that sweet spot for your overall finish time.
Here’s the full breakdown of the race, station by station and run by run, stacked against the average of athletes with similar finish times.
In HYROX, pacing is the name of the game. The pacing line shows where you hit the gas, tapped the brakes, or nailed it perfectly—guiding the way to a more balanced and dominant race strategy.
With the RoxCoach Simulation machine, you can see how your predicted finish time evolves as you power through your race. This next-level tech recalculates your estimated finish time after every run and every station. Crushing the sled pull? Gaining ground on the row? Or holding strong in the Wall Balls? RoxCoach tracks it all, giving you the inside scoop on where you shined and where there’s room to level up.
This chart breaks down the splits for every athlete in the division, giving you a clear look at how times are distributed across the pack.
Compare performance to the competition, spotting where they dominated and where there’s room to improve.
You’ll see how they stack up against the Top 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and beyond. Outliers are out—so the focus stays on the real competition.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve his time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:48. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 04:14 (From 49:29 to 45:15) | 73.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:47 (From 06:18 to 05:31) | 13.5% |
| Wall Balls | 00:28 (From 07:30 to 07:02) | 8.0% |
| BBJ | 00:11 (From 06:02 to 05:51) | 3.2% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:08 (From 02:26 to 02:18) | 2.3% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 (From 04:26 to 04:26) | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 (From 03:03 to 03:03) | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 (From 04:58 to 04:58) | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 (From 04:27 to 04:27) | 0.0% |
| Swire Jeremy | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:41 | 00:00 | 04:53 -01:12 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:26 | 03:41 | 04:33 -00:07 | 04:53 -01:12 |
| Running 2 | 05:46 | 08:07 | 05:20 +00:26 | 09:26 -01:19 |
| Sled Push | 03:03 | 13:53 | 03:11 -00:08 | 14:46 -00:53 |
| Running 3 | 06:24 | 16:56 | 05:50 +00:34 | 17:57 -01:01 |
| Sled Pull | 04:58 | 23:20 | 05:29 -00:31 | 23:47 -00:27 |
| Running 4 | 06:12 | 28:18 | 05:49 +00:23 | 29:16 -00:58 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:02 | 34:30 | 06:06 -00:04 | 35:05 -00:35 |
| Running 5 | 06:29 | 40:32 | 06:02 +00:27 | 41:11 -00:39 |
| Rowing | 04:27 | 47:01 | 04:59 -00:32 | 47:13 -00:12 |
| Running 6 | 06:25 | 51:28 | 05:51 +00:34 | 52:12 -00:44 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:26 | 57:53 | 02:22 +00:04 | 58:03 -00:10 |
| Running 7 | 07:50 | 01:00:19 | 05:50 +02:00 | 01:00:25 -00:06 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:18 | 01:08:09 | 05:41 +00:37 | 01:06:15 +01:54 |
| Running 8 | 06:45 | 01:14:27 | 06:38 +00:07 | 01:11:56 +02:31 |
| Wall Balls | 07:30 | 01:21:12 | 07:24 +00:06 | 01:18:34 +02:38 |
| Roxzone | 05:19 | 01:33:53 | 07:55 -02:36 | 01:33:53 |
Jeremy's best running lap was 00:03:41, which was 1 minute faster than the average. This indicates that he has good speed and endurance during shorter running segments.
To improve performance in these segments, Jeremy should focus on specific training strategies and techniques. Here are some suggestions:
1. Running 7: Jeremy lost 2 minutes compared to the average in this segment. He should work on improving his running endurance and speed. Interval training, such as high-intensity interval training (HIIT), can help improve his running performance. Additionally, incorporating hill sprints and tempo runs into his training routine can enhance his endurance.
2. Sandbag Lunges: Jeremy was 40 seconds slower than the average in this segment. To improve his performance, he should focus on strengthening his lower body muscles, particularly his quadriceps, hamstrings, and glutes. Exercises such as squats, lunges, and deadlifts can help build strength in these muscle groups. He should also work on his lunging technique, ensuring proper form and stability.
3. Running 6: Jeremy lost 35 seconds compared to the average in this segment. Similar to Running 7, he should focus on improving his running endurance and speed. Incorporating interval training, hill sprints, and tempo runs into his training routine can help him become more efficient and faster in this segment.
4. Running 3: Jeremy was 32 seconds slower than the average in this segment. Again, improving running endurance and speed should be a priority. Interval training, hill sprints, and tempo runs can help him improve his performance in this segment as well.
5. Running 2: Jeremy lost 30 seconds compared to the average in this segment. Similar to the previous running segments, he should focus on improving his running endurance and speed through interval training, hill sprints, and tempo runs.
6. Running 5: Jeremy was 29 seconds slower than the average in this segment. Improving running endurance and speed should be his main focus. Interval training, hill sprints, and tempo runs can help him become more efficient and faster in this segment.
7. Running 4: Jeremy lost 23 seconds compared to the average in this segment. Once again, improving running endurance and speed should be his priority. Incorporating interval training, hill sprints, and tempo runs into his training routine can help him improve his performance.
8. Burpees Broad Jump: Jeremy was 16 seconds slower than the average in this segment. To improve his performance, he should work on his explosive power and agility. Plyometric exercises, such as box jumps, squat jumps, and burpees, can help improve his power output and agility. He should also focus on maintaining proper form and technique during the broad jumps.
By implementing these strategies and focusing on specific training techniques, Jeremy can improve his overall performance in the HYROX race.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Nędza Adam | 2024 Katowice | 01:33:27 | |
| Bakker Koen | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:34:15 | |
| Sacristan Barrajon Sergio | 2023 Bilbao | 01:33:26 | |
| Chapman Scott | 2024 Dallas | 01:34:04 | |
| Zahr Adam | 2024 Sydney | 01:33:32 | |
| Fricker Philipp | 2018 Stuttgart | 01:33:53 | |
| Ramirez Paolo | 2022 New York | 01:33:53 | |
| Markmann Philipp | 2023 Hamburg | 01:34:21 | |
| Schäfer Marc | 2019 Hannover | 01:33:24 | |
| Ten Dolle Wessel | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:33:24 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
Swire Jeremy
