Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Chicago Navy Pier using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 450 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Rome Cody's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Rome Cody's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Rome Cody's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Rome Cody's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 07:33. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 04:42 | 58:55 to 54:13 | 62.3% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 02:39 | 10:36 to 07:57 | 35.1% |
| Rowing | 00:12 | 05:39 to 05:27 | 2.6% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:40 to 04:40 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:26 to 02:26 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 05:15 to 05:15 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:58 to 01:58 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 05:41 to 05:41 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 08:53 to 08:53 | 0.0% |
| Rome Cody | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:34 | 00:00 | 05:35 -01:01 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:40 | 04:34 | 04:54 -00:14 | 05:35 -01:01 |
| Running 2 | 06:24 | 09:14 | 06:21 +00:03 | 10:29 -01:15 |
| Sled Push | 02:26 | 15:38 | 03:56 -01:30 | 16:50 -01:12 |
| Running 3 | 07:43 | 18:04 | 07:07 +00:36 | 20:46 -02:42 |
| Sled Pull | 05:15 | 25:47 | 06:59 -01:44 | 27:53 -02:06 |
| Running 4 | 08:08 | 31:02 | 07:08 +01:00 | 34:52 -03:50 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 10:36 | 39:10 | 08:27 +02:09 | 42:00 -02:50 |
| Running 5 | 08:31 | 49:46 | 07:34 +00:57 | 50:27 -00:41 |
| Rowing | 05:39 | 58:17 | 05:30 +00:09 | 58:01 +00:16 |
| Running 6 | 07:39 | 01:03:56 | 07:16 +00:23 | 01:03:31 +00:25 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:58 | 01:11:35 | 02:52 -00:54 | 01:10:47 +00:48 |
| Running 7 | 07:21 | 01:13:33 | 07:16 +00:05 | 01:13:39 -00:06 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:41 | 01:20:54 | 07:47 -02:06 | 01:20:55 -00:01 |
| Running 8 | 08:38 | 01:26:35 | 09:09 -00:31 | 01:28:42 -02:07 |
| Wall Balls | 08:53 | 01:35:13 | 09:52 -00:59 | 01:37:51 -02:38 |
| Roxzone | 14:33 | 01:58:31 | 10:48 +03:45 | 01:58:31 |
Cody Rome demonstrated a commendable performance in the 2024 Chicago Navy Pier HYROX event. His overall rank was 739, placing him in the top 52% of 1404 athletes, and he ranked 170 in his age group of 30-34. His total running time was slightly slower than average by 01:06, indicating a potential area for improvement. He started the race strong, with his running 1 time being 00:59 faster than average. However, as the race progressed, his running times gradually slowed down compared to the average, indicating potential issues with endurance and pacing.
Upon analyzing his performance in different splits, several areas for improvement stand out:
Implementing specific race strategies could further improve Cody's performance:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Griffeth Tavin | 2023 Dallas | 01:58:20 | |
| Raja Dipak | 2023 London | 01:58:01 | |
| Liu Yueyang | 2024 Singapore National Stadium | 01:58:27 | |
| O'Connor David | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:58:27 | |
| Werthmann Daniel | 2024 Stuttgart | 01:58:01 | |
| Marra Antonio | 2023 Hamburg | 01:58:37 | |
| Gray Joshua | 2023 Barcelona | 01:58:26 | |
| Riedel Eric | 2022 Bremen | 01:58:19 | |
| Samir Kais | 2018 Hamburg | 01:58:11 | |
| Niturada Ruby Mar | 2024 Singapore National Stadium | 01:58:34 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
