Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Glasgow using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 479 similar athletes.
We stack your running times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you measure up. This chart breaks it down, showing whether you were blazing fast, cruising steady, or losing pace.
It’s all about finding out if your running strategy matched your overall finish time!
We pit your station times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you stack up. This chart shows if you crushed it, coasted, or found that sweet spot for your overall finish time.
Here’s the full breakdown of the race, station by station and run by run, stacked against the average of athletes with similar finish times.
In HYROX, pacing is the name of the game. The pacing line shows where you hit the gas, tapped the brakes, or nailed it perfectly—guiding the way to a more balanced and dominant race strategy.
With the RoxCoach Simulation machine, you can see how your predicted finish time evolves as you power through your race. This next-level tech recalculates your estimated finish time after every run and every station. Crushing the sled pull? Gaining ground on the row? Or holding strong in the Wall Balls? RoxCoach tracks it all, giving you the inside scoop on where you shined and where there’s room to level up.
This chart breaks down the splits for every athlete in the division, giving you a clear look at how times are distributed across the pack.
Compare performance to the competition, spotting where they dominated and where there’s room to improve.
You’ll see how they stack up against the Top 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and beyond. Outliers are out—so the focus stays on the real competition.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve his time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 10:08. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 06:51 (From 01:01:03 to 54:12) | 67.6% |
| Sled Pull | 00:58 (From 07:54 to 06:56) | 9.5% |
| Ski Erg | 00:43 (From 05:39 to 04:56) | 7.1% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:33 (From 07:52 to 07:19) | 5.4% |
| Rowing | 00:31 (From 05:58 to 05:27) | 5.1% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:25 (From 03:23 to 02:58) | 4.1% |
| Sled Push | 00:07 (From 04:11 to 04:04) | 1.2% |
| BBJ | 00:00 (From 06:57 to 06:57) | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 (From 07:16 to 07:16) | 0.0% |
| Grey Kevin Jan | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:35 | 00:00 | 05:34 +00:01 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:39 | 05:35 | 04:54 +00:45 | 05:34 +00:01 |
| Running 2 | 06:24 | 11:14 | 06:17 +00:07 | 10:28 +00:46 |
| Sled Push | 04:11 | 17:38 | 03:58 +00:13 | 16:45 +00:53 |
| Running 3 | 06:34 | 21:49 | 07:06 -00:32 | 20:43 +01:06 |
| Sled Pull | 07:54 | 28:23 | 07:05 +00:49 | 27:49 +00:34 |
| Running 4 | 07:00 | 36:17 | 07:06 -00:06 | 34:54 +01:23 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:57 | 43:17 | 08:21 -01:24 | 42:00 +01:17 |
| Running 5 | 07:23 | 50:14 | 07:30 -00:07 | 50:21 -00:07 |
| Rowing | 05:58 | 57:37 | 05:32 +00:26 | 57:51 -00:14 |
| Running 6 | 07:32 | 01:03:35 | 07:11 +00:21 | 01:03:23 +00:12 |
| Farmers Carry | 03:23 | 01:11:07 | 02:53 +00:30 | 01:10:34 +00:33 |
| Running 7 | 07:43 | 01:14:30 | 07:14 +00:29 | 01:13:27 +01:03 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 07:52 | 01:22:13 | 07:42 +00:10 | 01:20:41 +01:32 |
| Running 8 | 12:56 | 01:30:05 | 09:05 +03:51 | 01:28:23 +01:42 |
| Wall Balls | 07:16 | 01:43:01 | 09:56 -02:40 | 01:37:28 +05:33 |
| Roxzone | 08:09 | 01:58:17 | 10:53 -02:44 | 01:58:17 |
It is worth noting that Kevin's total running time of 01:01:03 is slightly slower than the average, indicating that he may need to focus on improving his overall fitness and transition time. Additionally, his best running lap time of 00:05:35 suggests that he has the potential to excel in running segments.
10. Sandbag Lunges: Kevin's time for this segment is 00:15 slower than average. To improve his performance in the Sandbag Lunges, Kevin should focus on improving his lower body strength and endurance. Exercises such as squats, lunges, and step-ups can help him develop the necessary strength and endurance for this segment.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Adams Tom | 2024 Birmingham | 01:58:22 | |
| Poltorak David | 2023 New York | 01:58:16 | |
| Carruana Andre | 2023 Los Angeles | 01:58:16 | |
| Perez Mario | 2024 New York | 01:58:24 | |
| Mendoza Richard | 2024 London | 01:58:24 | |
| Van Griethuijsen Stephan | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:57:51 | |
| Tournay Daniel | 2023 Birmingham | 01:57:48 | |
| Heijke Bart | 2023 Milan | 01:57:53 | |
| Dela Cruz Ian | 2022 Chicago | 01:58:07 | |
| Gardner Andrew | 2022 London | 01:58:15 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
Grey Kevin Jan
