Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Bevan Nigel's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Bevan Nigel's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Bevan Nigel's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Bevan Nigel's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 02:13. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:47 | 06:24 to 05:37 | 35.3% |
| Rowing | 00:35 | 05:28 to 04:53 | 26.3% |
| Sled Pull | 00:14 | 05:20 to 05:06 | 10.5% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:14 | 05:33 to 05:19 | 10.5% |
| Ski Erg | 00:13 | 04:43 to 04:30 | 9.8% |
| Wall Balls | 00:07 | 06:52 to 06:45 | 5.3% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:03 | 02:16 to 02:13 | 2.3% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:43 to 02:43 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 44:16 to 44:16 | 0.0% |
| Bevan Nigel | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:55 | 00:00 | 04:47 +01:08 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:43 | 05:55 | 04:33 +00:10 | 04:47 +01:08 |
| Running 2 | 05:04 | 10:38 | 05:14 -00:10 | 09:20 +01:18 |
| Sled Push | 02:43 | 15:42 | 03:06 -00:23 | 14:34 +01:08 |
| Running 3 | 05:10 | 18:25 | 05:43 -00:33 | 17:40 +00:45 |
| Sled Pull | 05:20 | 23:35 | 05:20 +00:00 | 23:23 +00:12 |
| Running 4 | 05:21 | 28:55 | 05:42 -00:21 | 28:43 +00:12 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:24 | 34:16 | 05:54 +00:30 | 34:25 -00:09 |
| Running 5 | 05:30 | 40:40 | 05:53 -00:23 | 40:19 +00:21 |
| Rowing | 05:28 | 46:10 | 04:57 +00:31 | 46:12 -00:02 |
| Running 6 | 05:29 | 51:38 | 05:43 -00:14 | 51:09 +00:29 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:16 | 57:07 | 02:19 -00:03 | 56:52 +00:15 |
| Running 7 | 05:40 | 59:23 | 05:42 -00:02 | 59:11 +00:12 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:33 | 01:05:03 | 05:33 +00:00 | 01:04:53 +00:10 |
| Running 8 | 06:11 | 01:10:36 | 06:26 -00:15 | 01:10:26 +00:10 |
| Wall Balls | 06:52 | 01:16:47 | 07:10 -00:18 | 01:16:52 -00:05 |
| Roxzone | 08:07 | 01:31:37 | 07:35 +00:32 | 01:31:37 |
Nigel Bevan showcased a commendable performance in the 2024 Birmingham HYROX race, ranking in the top 43% out of 4107 athletes, and making it to the top 20% of his age group (60-64). His overall time was 01:31:37. His total running time (00:44:16) was 01:11 faster than the average, indicating a strong running profile. However, there are areas where he lost time, impacting his overall ranking. Interestingly, Nigel started the race slower than the average pace, but increased his speed in the subsequent segments, indicating a strong pacing strategy.
Implementing the following strategies during the race can enhance Nigel's performance:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Bouma Richard | 2024 Anaheim | 01:31:54 | |
| Matthews Ryan | 2024 Brisbane | 01:31:45 | |
| Hughes Tom | 2023 Barcelona | 01:31:31 | |
| Almeida Luan | 2024 Melbourne | 01:31:57 | |
| Chotin Maxime | 2024 Paris | 01:31:26 | |
| Cohen Eli | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:31:31 | |
| Spreeth Jeandre | 2024 Cape Town | 01:31:50 | |
| Marzougui Dries | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:31:29 | |
| Cummings Rob | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:31:56 | |
| Fletcher Phillip | 2024 New York | 01:32:03 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
