Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Tindal Mark's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Tindal Mark's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Tindal Mark's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Tindal Mark's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:28. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 02:00 | 06:20 to 04:20 | 36.6% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:36 | 05:54 to 04:18 | 29.3% |
| Wall Balls | 01:31 | 06:50 to 05:19 | 27.7% |
| Sled Pull | 00:21 | 04:29 to 04:08 | 6.4% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:07 to 04:07 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:17 to 02:17 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:28 to 04:28 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:26 to 01:26 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 37:38 to 37:38 | 0.0% |
| Tindal Mark | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:05 | 00:00 | 04:20 +00:45 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:07 | 05:05 | 04:20 -00:13 | 04:20 +00:45 |
| Running 2 | 04:19 | 09:12 | 04:41 -00:22 | 08:40 +00:32 |
| Sled Push | 02:17 | 13:31 | 02:42 -00:25 | 13:21 +00:10 |
| Running 3 | 04:34 | 15:48 | 05:04 -00:30 | 16:03 -00:15 |
| Sled Pull | 04:29 | 20:22 | 04:30 -00:01 | 21:07 -00:45 |
| Running 4 | 04:45 | 24:51 | 05:04 -00:19 | 25:37 -00:46 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:20 | 29:36 | 04:46 +01:34 | 30:41 -01:05 |
| Running 5 | 04:49 | 35:56 | 05:12 -00:23 | 35:27 +00:29 |
| Rowing | 04:28 | 40:45 | 04:40 -00:12 | 40:39 +00:06 |
| Running 6 | 04:42 | 45:13 | 05:04 -00:22 | 45:19 -00:06 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:26 | 49:55 | 02:01 -00:35 | 50:23 -00:28 |
| Running 7 | 04:40 | 51:21 | 05:03 -00:23 | 52:24 -01:03 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:54 | 56:01 | 04:38 +01:16 | 57:27 -01:26 |
| Running 8 | 04:48 | 01:01:55 | 05:32 -00:44 | 01:02:05 -00:10 |
| Wall Balls | 06:50 | 01:06:43 | 05:52 +00:58 | 01:07:37 -00:54 |
| Roxzone | 06:07 | 01:19:33 | 06:04 +00:03 | 01:19:33 |
Mark Tindal showcased impressive performance in the 2024 Birmingham Hyrox race, ranking within the top 21% of 4107 total athletes and the top 24% of his age group. His overall time was 01:19:33, with a strong running time of 00:37:38, which was 02:35 faster than the average competitor. It is clear that Mark has a runner's profile, with the majority of his time saved in running segments. However, his pacing could use some improvement, as he started slower than average in the first running segment, but rapidly improved in subsequent ones.
Despite his overall excellent performance, there are several key segments Mark should focus on for improvements:
To improve overall race performance, Mark should focus on maintaining a consistent pace throughout the race. Starting too slow can lead to lost time, while starting too fast can lead to early fatigue. Mark should also focus on improving his transition times between exercise zones to reduce downtime. Additionally, incorporating more strength training into his routine, especially lower body and upper body exercises, can help improve performance in the slower segments.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Williams Anthony | 2024 Birmingham | 01:19:36 | |
| Benson David | 2023 Birmingham | 01:19:39 | |
| Gennermann Benjamin | 2021 Berlin | 01:19:35 | |
| Bowyer Paul | 2023 Paris | 01:19:08 | |
| Schlummer Max | 2022 Frankfurt | 01:19:42 | |
| Van De Velden Dax | 2024 Maastricht | 01:19:30 | |
| Penrod Mitch | 2024 Dallas | 01:19:24 | |
| Lancefield Thomas | 2024 Hamburg | 01:19:22 | |
| O'Meara Gavin | 2024 Stockholm | 01:19:37 | |
| Poole John | 2023 London | 01:19:32 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Glasgow | 01:17:31 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
