Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Poznan using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement.
For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of
913 similar athletes.
This chart provides a visual summary of the race performance, displaying percentile rankings for all running and workout segments. You can quickly see the strength and the weakness of the athlete.
Percentile based on all the athletes who competed in Hyrox Women
Run, Baby, Run!
We stack your running times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you measure up. This chart breaks it down, showing whether you were blazing fast, cruising steady, or losing pace.
It’s all about finding out if your running strategy matched your overall finish time!
Based on 913 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Women
Station Showdown
We pit your station times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you stack up. This chart shows if you crushed it, coasted, or found that sweet spot for your overall finish time.
Based on 913 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Women
Fast, slow, or steady?
Here’s the full breakdown of Stępień Maria's race, station by station and run by run, stacked against the average of athletes with similar finish times.
In HYROX, pacing is the name of the game. The pacing line shows where Stępień Maria hit the gas, tapped the brakes, or nailed it perfectly—guiding the way to a more balanced and dominant race strategy.
Based on 913 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Women
Expected Finish Time
With the RoxCoach Simulation machine, you can see how your predicted finish time evolves as you power through your race. This next-level tech recalculates your estimated finish time after every run and every station.
Crushing the sled pull? Gaining ground on the row? Or holding strong in the Wall Balls? RoxCoach tracks it all, giving you the inside scoop on where you shined and where there’s room to level up.
Spread of Splits Time
This chart breaks down the splits for every athlete in the division, giving you a clear look at how times are distributed across the pack.
Compare Stępień Maria’s performance to the competition, spotting where they dominated and where there’s room to improve.
You’ll see how they stack up against the Top 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and beyond. Outliers are out—so the focus stays on the real competition.
Percentile based on all the athletes who competed in Hyrox Women
Improvement Plan
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is
to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Stępień Maria's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst.
It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance.
Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of
10:04.
Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
Based on 913 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Women
A word from RoxCoach - Your AI Powered Trainer
Overall Performance:
Maria Stępień's performance in the 2024 Poznan HYROX race was commendable with an overall rank of 194 out of 1039 athletes, placing in the top 18%. Particularly noteworthy is her strength performance, where she consistently outperformed the average times. However, her overall running time was slower than average, indicating that she can benefit from focusing more on running training. As for pacing, Maria started slower in the initial running segments but improved her times in the later segments. This suggests a careful pacing strategy, but also points towards an opportunity to increase her initial pace slightly without risking burnout.
Segments to Improve:
Running: Maria's total running time was 08:24 slower than the average, indicating a need for improvement in this area. More emphasis should be placed on long distance running in training. Interval training, focusing on both speed and endurance, can also be beneficial. A sample exercise could be 1 minute of high-intensity running followed by 1-2 minutes of recovery, repeated 10-15 times. Incorporating hill runs and tempo runs can also improve her speed and endurance.
Running 2 and Running 5: These segments saw Maria significantly slower than the average, suggesting fatigue post strength exercises. To better prepare for such scenarios, compromised running training can be included in her routine. This involves running immediately after a strength workout, mimicking the transition in a race. This will help her body adapt to running under fatigue.
Race Strategies:
One key strategy for Maria would be to slightly increase her initial pace in the running segments. Given her strong performance in the later running segments, she has the endurance to maintain a faster pace without risking burnout. Furthermore, focusing on smoother transitions between strength exercises and running can also save valuable time. This involves both physical conditioning and mental preparedness to quickly switch between different types of exercise. Finally, since her strength segments are already strong, she can use these segments to gain time without over-exerting herself.