Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Poznan using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Przybylski Patryk's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Przybylski Patryk's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Przybylski Patryk's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Przybylski Patryk's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:13. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:37 | 06:14 to 04:37 | 31.0% |
| Wall Balls | 01:30 | 07:07 to 05:37 | 28.8% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:48 | 05:19 to 04:31 | 15.3% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:47 | 02:43 to 01:56 | 15.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:11 | 04:29 to 04:18 | 3.5% |
| Rowing | 00:11 | 04:49 to 04:38 | 3.5% |
| Sled Pull | 00:09 | 04:30 to 04:21 | 2.9% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:11 to 02:11 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 38:19 to 38:19 | 0.0% |
| Przybylski Patryk | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:44 | 00:00 | 04:28 +00:16 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:29 | 04:44 | 04:23 +00:06 | 04:28 +00:16 |
| Running 2 | 04:23 | 09:13 | 04:46 -00:23 | 08:51 +00:22 |
| Sled Push | 02:11 | 13:36 | 02:46 -00:35 | 13:37 -00:01 |
| Running 3 | 04:37 | 15:47 | 05:11 -00:34 | 16:23 -00:36 |
| Sled Pull | 04:30 | 20:24 | 04:40 -00:10 | 21:34 -01:10 |
| Running 4 | 04:40 | 24:54 | 05:08 -00:28 | 26:14 -01:20 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:14 | 29:34 | 04:58 +01:16 | 31:22 -01:48 |
| Running 5 | 04:43 | 35:48 | 05:18 -00:35 | 36:20 -00:32 |
| Rowing | 04:49 | 40:31 | 04:43 +00:06 | 41:38 -01:07 |
| Running 6 | 04:45 | 45:20 | 05:12 -00:27 | 46:21 -01:01 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:43 | 50:05 | 02:06 +00:37 | 51:33 -01:28 |
| Running 7 | 04:53 | 52:48 | 05:09 -00:16 | 53:39 -00:51 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:19 | 57:41 | 04:50 +00:29 | 58:48 -01:07 |
| Running 8 | 05:36 | 01:03:00 | 05:41 -00:05 | 01:03:38 -00:38 |
| Wall Balls | 07:07 | 01:08:36 | 06:07 +01:00 | 01:09:19 -00:43 |
| Roxzone | 06:12 | 01:21:48 | 06:22 -00:10 | 01:21:48 |
Patryk Przybylski had a strong performance in the Poznan Hyrox event, ranking in the top 41% of all athletes and top 43% in his age category. A notable highlight was his total running time, which was faster than average by 02:51. This indicates that Patryk has a stronger runner profile, which is further supported by his consistently fast times across all running segments. However, Patryk's performance in the roxzone was slightly below average, indicating some potential for improvement in transitions and overall fitness. In terms of pacing, Patryk started slower than average in Running 1 but quickly made up for this in subsequent segments, suggesting an effective strategy of conserving energy early in the race.
Patryk should consider implementing the following strategies in future races:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beigbeder Antonin | 2024 Marseille | 01:21:33 | |
| Hutchinson Jason | 2024 Melbourne | 01:21:35 | |
| Pascal Jonathan | 2024 Berlin | 01:22:08 | |
| Souza Gabriel | 2023 Chicago | 01:21:36 | |
| Kairies Yannik | 2023 Hamburg | 01:22:12 | |
| Velar Nicholas | 2024 Fort Lauderdale | 01:22:05 | |
| Tuohy Darren | 2024 Berlin | 01:21:36 | |
| Wäsler Dominik | 2023 München | 01:22:13 | |
| Bornais Thomas | 2024 Paris | 01:22:01 | |
| Smidt Jeroen | 2023 Frankfurt | 01:21:32 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Frankfurt | 01:26:35 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
