Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Mcmanus Paul's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Mcmanus Paul's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Mcmanus Paul's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Mcmanus Paul's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:02. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 01:46 | 07:11 to 05:25 | 29.3% |
| Sled Push | 01:26 | 03:52 to 02:26 | 23.8% |
| Sled Pull | 00:57 | 05:09 to 04:12 | 15.7% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:54 | 05:19 to 04:25 | 14.9% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:26 | 02:18 to 01:52 | 7.2% |
| Rowing | 00:17 | 04:52 to 04:35 | 4.7% |
| Ski Erg | 00:08 | 04:23 to 04:15 | 2.2% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:08 | 04:30 to 04:22 | 2.2% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 35:57 to 35:57 | 0.0% |
| Mcmanus Paul | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:45 | 00:00 | 04:22 +00:23 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:23 | 04:45 | 04:21 +00:02 | 04:22 +00:23 |
| Running 2 | 04:08 | 09:08 | 04:42 -00:34 | 08:43 +00:25 |
| Sled Push | 03:52 | 13:16 | 02:43 +01:09 | 13:25 -00:09 |
| Running 3 | 04:23 | 17:08 | 05:06 -00:43 | 16:08 +01:00 |
| Sled Pull | 05:09 | 21:31 | 04:33 +00:36 | 21:14 +00:17 |
| Running 4 | 04:15 | 26:40 | 05:04 -00:49 | 25:47 +00:53 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:19 | 30:55 | 04:50 +00:29 | 30:51 +00:04 |
| Running 5 | 04:35 | 36:14 | 05:13 -00:38 | 35:41 +00:33 |
| Rowing | 04:52 | 40:49 | 04:40 +00:12 | 40:54 -00:05 |
| Running 6 | 04:32 | 45:41 | 05:06 -00:34 | 45:34 +00:07 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:18 | 50:13 | 02:02 +00:16 | 50:40 -00:27 |
| Running 7 | 04:27 | 52:31 | 05:04 -00:37 | 52:42 -00:11 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:30 | 56:58 | 04:41 -00:11 | 57:46 -00:48 |
| Running 8 | 04:55 | 01:01:28 | 05:33 -00:38 | 01:02:27 -00:59 |
| Wall Balls | 07:11 | 01:06:23 | 05:56 +01:15 | 01:08:00 -01:37 |
| Roxzone | 06:36 | 01:20:04 | 06:08 +00:28 | 01:20:04 |
Paul McManus showcased an impressive performance at the 2024 Birmingham HYROX race, finishing within the top 22% of all participating athletes. He demonstrated a strong runner profile with a total running time 04:28 faster than the average. Despite a slow start in Running 1, he quickly recovered and exceeded the average speed in subsequent running segments. This may suggest that Paul started the race too slow and could benefit from a faster start in future races. It's also worth noting that his roxzone time was slower than average, indicating potential areas for improvement in transition efficiency and overall fitness.
For future races, Paul might consider starting with a faster pace to make the most of his running strength. This could help him gain an early lead and maintain a steady pace throughout the race. Additionally, focusing on efficient transitions between exercises can help to shave off valuable seconds from his overall time. Lastly, given his strength in running, Paul should aim to maintain his pace in the running segments to compensate for time lost in strength-based exercises.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Kapala Mathias | 2024 Malaga | 01:19:42 | |
| Queay Adam | 2024 Melbourne | 01:20:29 | |
| Bausson Kevin | 2024 Marseille | 01:20:34 | |
| Whoriskey Adam | 2024 Dublin | 01:20:02 | |
| Aakerlund Daniel | 2023 Stockholm | 01:20:15 | |
| Burke Jp | 2022 London | 01:19:41 | |
| Marra Eugenio Davide | 2023 Milan | 01:20:09 | |
| O'Brien Conor | 2024 Birmingham | 01:19:36 | |
| Torta Simone | 2024 Milan | 01:20:07 | |
| Rhodes Adam | 2023 London | 01:20:32 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Dublin | 01:15:28 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
