Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We stack your running times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you measure up. This chart breaks it down, showing whether you were blazing fast, cruising steady, or losing pace.
It’s all about finding out if your running strategy matched your overall finish time!
We pit your station times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you stack up. This chart shows if you crushed it, coasted, or found that sweet spot for your overall finish time.
Here’s the full breakdown of the race, station by station and run by run, stacked against the average of athletes with similar finish times.
In HYROX, pacing is the name of the game. The pacing line shows where you hit the gas, tapped the brakes, or nailed it perfectly—guiding the way to a more balanced and dominant race strategy.
With the RoxCoach Simulation machine, you can see how your predicted finish time evolves as you power through your race. This next-level tech recalculates your estimated finish time after every run and every station. Crushing the sled pull? Gaining ground on the row? Or holding strong in the Wall Balls? RoxCoach tracks it all, giving you the inside scoop on where you shined and where there’s room to level up.
This chart breaks down the splits for every athlete in the division, giving you a clear look at how times are distributed across the pack.
Compare performance to the competition, spotting where they dominated and where there’s room to improve.
You’ll see how they stack up against the Top 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and beyond. Outliers are out—so the focus stays on the real competition.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve his time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:29. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:59 (From 09:02 to 05:03) | 72.6% |
| BBJ | 01:09 (From 06:26 to 05:17) | 21.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:21 (From 02:28 to 02:07) | 6.4% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 (From 04:17 to 04:17) | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 (From 02:40 to 02:40) | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 (From 04:49 to 04:49) | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 (From 04:39 to 04:39) | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 (From 05:22 to 05:22) | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 (From 41:29 to 41:29) | 0.0% |
| Mclaughlin Dan | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:23 | 00:00 | 04:43 +00:40 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:17 | 05:23 | 04:29 -00:12 | 04:43 +00:40 |
| Running 2 | 04:42 | 09:40 | 05:05 -00:23 | 09:12 +00:28 |
| Sled Push | 02:40 | 14:22 | 03:00 -00:20 | 14:17 +00:05 |
| Running 3 | 04:48 | 17:02 | 05:32 -00:44 | 17:17 -00:15 |
| Sled Pull | 04:49 | 21:50 | 05:06 -00:17 | 22:49 -00:59 |
| Running 4 | 05:04 | 26:39 | 05:31 -00:27 | 27:55 -01:16 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:26 | 31:43 | 05:36 +00:50 | 33:26 -01:43 |
| Running 5 | 05:16 | 38:09 | 05:42 -00:26 | 39:02 -00:53 |
| Rowing | 04:39 | 43:25 | 04:52 -00:13 | 44:44 -01:19 |
| Running 6 | 05:14 | 48:04 | 05:33 -00:19 | 49:36 -01:32 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:28 | 53:18 | 02:15 +00:13 | 55:09 -01:51 |
| Running 7 | 05:11 | 55:46 | 05:32 -00:21 | 57:24 -01:38 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 09:02 | 01:00:57 | 05:21 +03:41 | 01:02:56 -01:59 |
| Running 8 | 05:55 | 01:09:59 | 06:12 -00:17 | 01:08:17 +01:42 |
| Wall Balls | 05:22 | 01:15:54 | 06:48 -01:26 | 01:14:29 +01:25 |
| Roxzone | 07:17 | 01:28:25 | 07:08 +00:09 | 01:28:25 |
Dan Mclaughlin demonstrated a commendable performance, finishing in the top 38% of all athletes and top 36% in his age group. He particularly excelled in running, where he finished 02:39 faster than average, showcasing his exceptional endurance capabilities. This is evident in his overall running time of 00:41:29 and fastest lap time of 00:04:42. However, starting the race somewhat slower than average indicates a need to work on his initial pacing. Despite this slower start, he managed to finish stronger, suggesting a more runner profile. His performance in the strength-based exercises was slightly below par compared to his running, indicating a need for more focus on strength training.
Pacing: Dan should consider starting the race at a slightly faster pace to avoid playing catch up later in the race. He can achieve this by incorporating speed work in his training, such as interval runs and tempo runs. Strength Training: As the strength-based segments have been identified as weaker areas, Dan should incorporate more strength training into his routine. This can be done by including more weight lifting sessions and specific exercises to target the muscle groups required for each segment. Recovery: Given the slower Roxzone time, Dan should also focus on improving his recovery time. This can be achieved by incorporating more cardiovascular exercises into his routine and ensuring he takes adequate rest between sets during training.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Hartung Jendrik | 2022 Karlsruhe | 01:28:19 | |
| Owen James | 2024 Berlin | 01:28:10 | |
| Costa Tristan | 2022 Amsterdam | 01:28:04 | |
| Escudero Raul | 2024 Madrid | 01:28:09 | |
| Schmale Martijn | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:28:20 | |
| Domenech Garcia Carles | 2023 Barcelona | 01:27:55 | |
| Huizenga Niek | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:28:13 | |
| Albuquerque Diogo | 2024 Paris | 01:28:46 | |
| Pianigiani Iacopo | 2024 Milan | 01:28:46 | |
| Morsche Julian | 2019 Oberhausen | 01:28:38 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Incheon Mclaughlin Dan | 01:44:59 | |
| 2024 Manchester Mclaughlin Dan | 01:28:20 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
Mclaughlin Dan
