Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Melbourne using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 549 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Mam Kerven's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Mam Kerven's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Mam Kerven's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Mam Kerven's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 07:28. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 06:12 | 59:15 to 53:03 | 83.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:43 | 07:47 to 07:04 | 9.6% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:15 | 07:56 to 07:41 | 3.3% |
| Sled Pull | 00:12 | 06:55 to 06:43 | 2.7% |
| Rowing | 00:04 | 05:27 to 05:23 | 0.9% |
| Ski Erg | 00:02 | 04:55 to 04:53 | 0.4% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 03:02 to 03:02 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:35 to 02:35 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 08:07 to 08:07 | 0.0% |
| Mam Kerven | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:18 | 00:00 | 05:35 -00:17 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:55 | 05:18 | 04:51 +00:04 | 05:35 -00:17 |
| Running 2 | 08:22 | 10:13 | 06:15 +02:07 | 10:26 -00:13 |
| Sled Push | 03:02 | 18:35 | 03:49 -00:47 | 16:41 +01:54 |
| Running 3 | 08:30 | 21:37 | 06:59 +01:31 | 20:30 +01:07 |
| Sled Pull | 06:55 | 30:07 | 06:40 +00:15 | 27:29 +02:38 |
| Running 4 | 06:03 | 37:02 | 06:56 -00:53 | 34:09 +02:53 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:56 | 43:05 | 07:57 -00:01 | 41:05 +02:00 |
| Running 5 | 09:18 | 51:01 | 07:19 +01:59 | 49:02 +01:59 |
| Rowing | 05:27 | 01:00:19 | 05:25 +00:02 | 56:21 +03:58 |
| Running 6 | 06:00 | 01:05:46 | 07:01 -01:01 | 01:01:46 +04:00 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:35 | 01:11:46 | 02:52 -00:17 | 01:08:47 +02:59 |
| Running 7 | 06:17 | 01:14:21 | 07:03 -00:46 | 01:11:39 +02:42 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 07:47 | 01:20:38 | 07:15 +00:32 | 01:18:42 +01:56 |
| Running 8 | 09:31 | 01:28:25 | 08:50 +00:41 | 01:25:57 +02:28 |
| Wall Balls | 08:07 | 01:37:56 | 09:30 -01:23 | 01:34:47 +03:09 |
| Roxzone | 09:09 | 01:55:03 | 10:46 -01:37 | 01:55:03 |
Kerven Mam's performance at the 2024 Melbourne Hyrox race places him in the top 58% overall and top 59% within his age group. His total running time was 3:07 slower than average, indicating room for improvement in running. However, Kerven excelled in specific segments such as Sled Push and Wall Balls, showcasing his strength capacity. The analysis of his running segments reveals that Kerven started the race slightly faster than average but struggled to maintain this pace in the subsequent runs, indicating a need for better pacing and endurance.
In terms of his profile, Kerven demonstrates a hybrid ability but leans more towards strength, given his impressive performance in strength-based exercises. To optimize his overall performance, he should focus on enhancing his running capabilities.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Leber Maik | 2023 Hamburg | 01:54:39 | |
| Metz Dave | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:55:33 | |
| Upton Joshua | 2022 Dallas | 01:55:33 | |
| Kang Alvin | 2024 Singapore National Stadium | 01:54:54 | |
| Shifteh Anthony | 2022 Basel | 01:54:38 | |
| Sageder Sebastian | 2019 Nürnberg | 01:54:54 | |
| Kraus Denis | 2020 Karlsruhe | 01:54:50 | |
| Wegener Bernd | 2023 World Championships Manchester | 01:55:29 | |
| Román Vallinoto Jorge | 2024 Paris | 01:54:45 | |
| Lai Geoffrey | 2024 Singapore | 01:54:58 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
