Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Poznan using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 228 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Logue Michael's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Logue Michael's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Logue Michael's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Logue Michael's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:38. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 01:04 | 05:27 to 04:23 | 29.4% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:57 | 03:39 to 02:42 | 26.1% |
| Sled Pull | 00:32 | 04:26 to 03:54 | 14.7% |
| Rowing | 00:25 | 04:29 to 04:04 | 11.5% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:22 | 01:53 to 01:31 | 10.1% |
| Ski Erg | 00:09 | 03:57 to 03:48 | 4.1% |
| Sled Push | 00:09 | 02:28 to 02:19 | 4.1% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 03:18 to 03:18 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 29:33 to 29:33 | 0.0% |
| Logue Michael | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:48 | 00:00 | 03:28 +00:20 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 03:57 | 03:48 | 03:53 +00:04 | 03:28 +00:20 |
| Running 2 | 03:22 | 07:45 | 03:42 -00:20 | 07:21 +00:24 |
| Sled Push | 02:28 | 11:07 | 02:48 -00:20 | 11:03 +00:04 |
| Running 3 | 03:37 | 13:35 | 03:58 -00:21 | 13:51 -00:16 |
| Sled Pull | 04:26 | 17:12 | 04:15 +00:11 | 17:49 -00:37 |
| Running 4 | 03:43 | 21:38 | 03:59 -00:16 | 22:04 -00:26 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 03:39 | 25:21 | 02:54 +00:45 | 26:03 -00:42 |
| Running 5 | 03:40 | 29:00 | 04:03 -00:23 | 28:57 +00:03 |
| Rowing | 04:29 | 32:40 | 04:07 +00:22 | 33:00 -00:20 |
| Running 6 | 03:37 | 37:09 | 04:00 -00:23 | 37:07 +00:02 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:53 | 40:46 | 01:40 +00:13 | 41:07 -00:21 |
| Running 7 | 03:38 | 42:39 | 04:04 -00:26 | 42:47 -00:08 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:18 | 46:17 | 03:33 -00:15 | 46:51 -00:34 |
| Running 8 | 04:12 | 49:35 | 04:18 -00:06 | 50:24 -00:49 |
| Wall Balls | 05:27 | 53:47 | 04:43 +00:44 | 54:42 -00:55 |
| Roxzone | 04:21 | 01:03:28 | 04:03 +00:18 | 01:03:28 |
Michael Logue demonstrated a strong performance, ranking in the top 14% overall and top 36% in his age group. His total running time was notably faster than average, indicating his significant strength in running. This running prowess was particularly evident in the later stages of the race, suggesting excellent pacing and endurance. However, his roxzone time was slower than average, suggesting a potential area for improvement in transition times and overall fitness levels.
Given Michael's strength in running, he should aim to maintain a steady pace in the early running segments to conserve energy for the strength-based exercises. He should also focus on efficient transitions between segments to minimize time spent in the roxzone. Furthermore, incorporating specific strength exercises in his training will help him to improve in the more physically demanding segments such as the wall balls and sled pull. Finally, practicing the specific movements and transitions under compromised running scenarios post specific exercises can prepare him better for race conditions.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Wills Beau | 2022 Frankfurt | 01:03:30 | |
| Proctor Warren | 2024 Perth | 01:03:17 | |
| Arnaud Jerome | 2024 Karlsruhe | 01:03:44 | |
| Tucek Bay | 2024 Melbourne | 01:03:29 | |
| Martin Peral David | 2023 World Championships Manchester | 01:03:22 | |
| Stephens Michael | 2024 Birmingham | 01:03:05 | |
| Vladyka Jan | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:03:51 | |
| Spilman Ben | 2024 Birmingham | 01:03:18 | |
| Jasny Manuel | 2019 Wien | 01:03:39 | |
| Lousa Tiago | 2022 Maastricht | 01:03:15 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Dubai | 01:04:21 | |
| 2024 Dubai | 01:00:17 | |
| 2023 Manchester | 01:08:01 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
