Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Paris using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Clarke Mathew's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Clarke Mathew's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Clarke Mathew's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Clarke Mathew's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:12. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:03 | 45:25 to 43:22 | 39.4% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:55 | 07:19 to 05:24 | 36.9% |
| Sled Pull | 01:12 | 06:09 to 04:57 | 23.1% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:02 | 05:11 to 05:09 | 0.6% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 03:56 to 03:56 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:45 to 02:45 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:30 to 04:30 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:56 to 01:56 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:27 to 05:27 | 0.0% |
| Clarke Mathew | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:28 | 00:00 | 04:46 -00:18 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 03:56 | 04:28 | 04:30 -00:34 | 04:46 -00:18 |
| Running 2 | 05:23 | 08:24 | 05:07 +00:16 | 09:16 -00:52 |
| Sled Push | 02:45 | 13:47 | 03:04 -00:19 | 14:23 -00:36 |
| Running 3 | 06:03 | 16:32 | 05:36 +00:27 | 17:27 -00:55 |
| Sled Pull | 06:09 | 22:35 | 05:13 +00:56 | 23:03 -00:28 |
| Running 4 | 05:51 | 28:44 | 05:35 +00:16 | 28:16 +00:28 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:19 | 34:35 | 05:42 +01:37 | 33:51 +00:44 |
| Running 5 | 05:52 | 41:54 | 05:47 +00:05 | 39:33 +02:21 |
| Rowing | 04:30 | 47:46 | 04:54 -00:24 | 45:20 +02:26 |
| Running 6 | 05:56 | 52:16 | 05:36 +00:20 | 50:14 +02:02 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:56 | 58:12 | 02:17 -00:21 | 55:50 +02:22 |
| Running 7 | 05:42 | 01:00:08 | 05:35 +00:07 | 58:07 +02:01 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:11 | 01:05:50 | 05:26 -00:15 | 01:03:42 +02:08 |
| Running 8 | 06:15 | 01:11:01 | 06:17 -00:02 | 01:09:08 +01:53 |
| Wall Balls | 05:27 | 01:17:16 | 06:55 -01:28 | 01:15:25 +01:51 |
| Roxzone | 07:10 | 01:29:44 | 07:24 -00:14 | 01:29:44 |
Mathew Clarke performed admirably in the 2024 Paris HYROX race, ranking in the top 60% of all athletes and the top 66% within his age group. Despite having a total running time slightly slower than average, he demonstrated outstanding performance in several segments, notably in the Ski Erg and Rowing segments where he was faster than the average by 34 and 24 seconds respectively. His best running lap time was 5 minutes 23 seconds.
Mathew's performance indicates a more strength-oriented profile as he performed better in strength-focused segments such as Ski Erg, Sled Push, and Farmers Carry. His pacing showed a strong start in the Running 1 segment but slowed down in the subsequent running segments. This suggests that he may have started the race at a faster pace than he could consistently maintain.
Considering Mathew's performance, a few strategies can be implemented for better race performance:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Heeney Terence | 2024 Stockholm | 01:29:41 | |
| Feeney Michael | 2024 Malaga | 01:30:02 | |
| Clement Chris | 2024 Paris | 01:29:37 | |
| Kannout Marcin | 2024 Dubai | 01:30:11 | |
| Von Schmeling Finn | 2018 Hamburg | 01:29:14 | |
| Keuthen Oliver | 2018 Essen | 01:30:12 | |
| Elsner Isaac | 2024 Dallas | 01:29:33 | |
| Shergill Brendan | 2024 Melbourne | 01:29:22 | |
| Rutherford John | 2024 Birmingham | 01:29:18 | |
| Krogmann Jan | 2022 Leipzig | 01:29:25 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
