Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Verbeek Thijs's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Verbeek Thijs's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Verbeek Thijs's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Verbeek Thijs's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:11. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 04:32 | 46:11 to 41:39 | 87.5% |
| Ski Erg | 00:15 | 04:38 to 04:23 | 4.8% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:10 | 02:13 to 02:03 | 3.2% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:08 | 05:08 to 05:00 | 2.6% |
| Rowing | 00:06 | 04:50 to 04:44 | 1.9% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:33 to 02:33 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:20 to 04:20 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:29 to 04:29 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:52 to 05:52 | 0.0% |
| Verbeek Thijs | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:59 | 00:00 | 04:36 +01:23 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:38 | 05:59 | 04:27 +00:11 | 04:36 +01:23 |
| Running 2 | 05:26 | 10:37 | 04:57 +00:29 | 09:03 +01:34 |
| Sled Push | 02:33 | 16:03 | 02:55 -00:22 | 14:00 +02:03 |
| Running 3 | 05:35 | 18:36 | 05:24 +00:11 | 16:55 +01:41 |
| Sled Pull | 04:20 | 24:11 | 04:57 -00:37 | 22:19 +01:52 |
| Running 4 | 05:50 | 28:31 | 05:22 +00:28 | 27:16 +01:15 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:08 | 34:21 | 05:19 -00:11 | 32:38 +01:43 |
| Running 5 | 05:54 | 39:29 | 05:33 +00:21 | 37:57 +01:32 |
| Rowing | 04:50 | 45:23 | 04:50 +00:00 | 43:30 +01:53 |
| Running 6 | 05:46 | 50:13 | 05:24 +00:22 | 48:20 +01:53 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:13 | 55:59 | 02:11 +00:02 | 53:44 +02:15 |
| Running 7 | 05:34 | 58:12 | 05:23 +00:11 | 55:55 +02:17 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:29 | 01:03:46 | 05:06 -00:37 | 01:01:18 +02:28 |
| Running 8 | 06:11 | 01:08:15 | 06:00 +00:11 | 01:06:24 +01:51 |
| Wall Balls | 05:52 | 01:14:26 | 06:31 -00:39 | 01:12:24 +02:02 |
| Roxzone | 05:37 | 01:25:46 | 06:51 -01:14 | 01:25:46 |
Thijs Verbeek delivered an impressive performance in the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox race, securing an overall rank of 1088, which places him in the top 34% of all participating athletes and top 35% in his age group. Despite the commendable rank, analysis of his total running time indicates that Thijs tends to have a stronger profile in strength-based exercises, excelling in segments such as the Sled Push, Sled Pull, Sandbag Lunges, and Wall Balls. However, his total running time was 3:07 slower than the average, suggesting that his running performance could be enhanced. Notably, his initial running segments (Running 1 to Running 4) suggest a moderately slow start, with each segment being slower than average, indicating a need to improve pacing and stamina.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Clarke Anthony | 2024 Malaga | 01:25:19 | |
| Raschke Fabian | 2019 Nürnberg | 01:26:05 | |
| Van Eck Theo | 2024 Taipei | 01:25:39 | |
| Roberts Tony | 2024 Manchester | 01:25:34 | |
| Cheyne Angus | 2024 Manchester | 01:25:18 | |
| Pelizzoni Stefano | 2024 Milan | 01:25:35 | |
| Grund Stephan | 2024 Berlin | 01:25:26 | |
| Bianchi Stefano | 2023 Rotterdam | 01:25:56 | |
| Ortiz Michael | 2021 Dallas | 01:26:14 | |
| Rainaldi Marco | 2024 Melbourne | 01:25:47 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Rotterdam | 01:37:12 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
