Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Perth using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire TingleBeaton Liam's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights TingleBeaton Liam's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the TingleBeaton Liam's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve TingleBeaton Liam's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:10. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 02:34 | 08:28 to 05:54 | 81.1% |
| Sled Pull | 00:28 | 05:47 to 05:19 | 14.7% |
| Rowing | 00:08 | 05:05 to 04:57 | 4.2% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:28 to 04:28 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:56 to 02:56 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:01 to 02:01 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:38 to 04:38 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 06:34 to 06:34 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 44:18 to 44:18 | 0.0% |
| TingleBeaton Liam | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:37 | 00:00 | 04:56 +00:41 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:28 | 05:37 | 04:34 -00:06 | 04:56 +00:41 |
| Running 2 | 04:54 | 10:05 | 05:22 -00:28 | 09:30 +00:35 |
| Sled Push | 02:56 | 14:59 | 03:11 -00:15 | 14:52 +00:07 |
| Running 3 | 05:34 | 17:55 | 05:52 -00:18 | 18:03 -00:08 |
| Sled Pull | 05:47 | 23:29 | 05:31 +00:16 | 23:55 -00:26 |
| Running 4 | 05:45 | 29:16 | 05:51 -00:06 | 29:26 -00:10 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 08:28 | 35:01 | 06:09 +02:19 | 35:17 -00:16 |
| Running 5 | 05:43 | 43:29 | 06:04 -00:21 | 41:26 +02:03 |
| Rowing | 05:05 | 49:12 | 05:00 +00:05 | 47:30 +01:42 |
| Running 6 | 05:20 | 54:17 | 05:53 -00:33 | 52:30 +01:47 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:01 | 59:37 | 02:24 -00:23 | 58:23 +01:14 |
| Running 7 | 05:24 | 01:01:38 | 05:52 -00:28 | 01:00:47 +00:51 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:38 | 01:07:02 | 05:45 -01:07 | 01:06:39 +00:23 |
| Running 8 | 06:04 | 01:11:40 | 06:42 -00:38 | 01:12:24 -00:44 |
| Wall Balls | 06:34 | 01:17:44 | 07:26 -00:52 | 01:19:06 -01:22 |
| Roxzone | 10:19 | 01:34:30 | 07:58 +02:21 | 01:34:30 |
Liam TingleBeaton delivered a commendable performance in the 2024 Perth HYROX race, finishing in the top 49% overall and the top 42% in his age group. His overall time of 01:34:30 was competitive, with a particularly strong showing in the running segments. His total running time of 00:44:18 was 2 minutes and 35 seconds faster than the average, indicating a strong running profile. This suggests that while Liam excels in running, he may need to enhance his strength and transitional skills to further improve his overall performance. His pacing strategy appeared conservative at the start, as indicated by a slower-than-average Running 1, but he maintained faster-than-average times in subsequent running segments, showing a consistent and sustainable pace throughout the race.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Couceiro Ariel | 2024 Melbourne | 01:34:22 | |
| Prowse Lee | 2023 Birmingham | 01:34:19 | |
| Bhagwan Amar | 2024 Birmingham | 01:34:28 | |
| Tomohiko Sato | 2024 Hong Kong | 01:34:11 | |
| Jones Harley | 2023 London | 01:34:34 | |
| Baye Nils | 2024 Hamburg | 01:34:30 | |
| Offerdahl Mark | 2021 New York | 01:34:20 | |
| Fleming Ryan | 2024 Glasgow | 01:34:10 | |
| Sartori Pietro Giuseppe | 2024 Milan | 01:34:21 | |
| Carver Calum | 2023 London | 01:34:07 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
