Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Perth using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Schmaling Amber's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Schmaling Amber's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Schmaling Amber's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Schmaling Amber's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 02:33. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:24 | 05:18 to 03:54 | 54.9% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:27 | 02:21 to 01:54 | 17.6% |
| Sled Pull | 00:15 | 04:50 to 04:35 | 9.8% |
| Run Total | 00:14 | 40:58 to 40:44 | 9.2% |
| Wall Balls | 00:08 | 03:45 to 03:37 | 5.2% |
| Ski Erg | 00:05 | 04:52 to 04:47 | 3.3% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 01:56 to 01:56 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:43 to 04:43 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:49 to 04:49 | 0.0% |
| Schmaling Amber | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:34 | 00:00 | 04:42 +00:52 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:52 | 05:34 | 04:56 -00:04 | 04:42 +00:52 |
| Running 2 | 04:48 | 10:26 | 05:02 -00:14 | 09:38 +00:48 |
| Sled Push | 01:56 | 15:14 | 02:31 -00:35 | 14:40 +00:34 |
| Running 3 | 04:56 | 17:10 | 05:18 -00:22 | 17:11 -00:01 |
| Sled Pull | 04:50 | 22:06 | 05:09 -00:19 | 22:29 -00:23 |
| Running 4 | 05:06 | 26:56 | 05:19 -00:13 | 27:38 -00:42 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:43 | 32:02 | 05:17 -00:34 | 32:57 -00:55 |
| Running 5 | 05:10 | 36:45 | 05:26 -00:16 | 38:14 -01:29 |
| Rowing | 04:49 | 41:55 | 05:09 -00:20 | 43:40 -01:45 |
| Running 6 | 05:15 | 46:44 | 05:21 -00:06 | 48:49 -02:05 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:21 | 51:59 | 02:05 +00:16 | 54:10 -02:11 |
| Running 7 | 05:12 | 54:20 | 05:19 -00:07 | 56:15 -01:55 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:18 | 59:32 | 04:15 +01:03 | 01:01:34 -02:02 |
| Running 8 | 05:00 | 01:04:50 | 05:37 -00:37 | 01:05:49 -00:59 |
| Wall Balls | 03:45 | 01:09:50 | 04:18 -00:33 | 01:11:26 -01:36 |
| Roxzone | 08:07 | 01:21:36 | 05:52 +02:15 | 01:21:36 |
Amber Schmaling delivered a commendable performance at the 2024 Perth HYROX race, securing an overall rank of 59th out of 688 athletes, placing her in the top 8%. Within her age group (25-29), she ranked 15th, which is within the top 12%. Her overall time was 01:21:36.
Amber's total running time was 00:40:58, which was 01:32 faster than the average, indicating a strong running profile. Her pacing strategy suggests she started slightly slower in the first running segment but quickly adapted to a faster pace, consistent with her overall faster than average running time. This suggests she has a hybrid profile with a slight edge in running ability.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Paton Amelia | 2024 Milan | 01:21:49 | |
| Ferdinando Amy | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:21:35 | |
| Willett Antigone | 2022 London | 01:21:23 | |
| Van Der Ros Jansen Holleboom Tamara | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:21:36 | |
| Schmidt Kathleen | 2019 Frankfurt | 01:21:35 | |
| Roll Sabrina | 2024 Chicago Navy Pier | 01:21:31 | |
| Lorenc Kathrin | 2021 Hamburg | 01:21:37 | |
| Salmon Flavie | 2024 Paris | 01:21:06 | |
| Heywood Sophie | 2023 London | 01:21:20 | |
| Bonne Frederikke | 2024 Copenhagen | 01:21:15 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Melbourne | 01:15:40 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
