Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Melbourne using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Nash Michael's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Nash Michael's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Nash Michael's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Nash Michael's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:05. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:44 | 06:59 to 05:15 | 42.4% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:08 | 06:40 to 05:32 | 27.8% |
| Wall Balls | 00:46 | 07:25 to 06:39 | 18.8% |
| Ski Erg | 00:13 | 04:42 to 04:29 | 5.3% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:09 | 02:21 to 02:12 | 3.7% |
| Run Total | 00:04 | 43:58 to 43:54 | 1.6% |
| Rowing | 00:01 | 04:53 to 04:52 | 0.4% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:17 to 02:17 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:54 to 04:54 | 0.0% |
| Nash Michael | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:06 | 00:00 | 04:45 +00:21 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:42 | 05:06 | 04:31 +00:11 | 04:45 +00:21 |
| Running 2 | 05:01 | 09:48 | 05:10 -00:09 | 09:16 +00:32 |
| Sled Push | 02:17 | 14:49 | 03:04 -00:47 | 14:26 +00:23 |
| Running 3 | 05:04 | 17:06 | 05:39 -00:35 | 17:30 -00:24 |
| Sled Pull | 04:54 | 22:10 | 05:17 -00:23 | 23:09 -00:59 |
| Running 4 | 05:15 | 27:04 | 05:38 -00:23 | 28:26 -01:22 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:40 | 32:19 | 05:49 +00:51 | 34:04 -01:45 |
| Running 5 | 07:23 | 38:59 | 05:50 +01:33 | 39:53 -00:54 |
| Rowing | 04:53 | 46:22 | 04:56 -00:03 | 45:43 +00:39 |
| Running 6 | 05:11 | 51:15 | 05:40 -00:29 | 50:39 +00:36 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:21 | 56:26 | 02:18 +00:03 | 56:19 +00:07 |
| Running 7 | 05:01 | 58:47 | 05:39 -00:38 | 58:37 +00:10 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:59 | 01:03:48 | 05:30 +01:29 | 01:04:16 -00:28 |
| Running 8 | 05:59 | 01:10:47 | 06:22 -00:23 | 01:09:46 +01:01 |
| Wall Balls | 07:25 | 01:16:46 | 07:03 +00:22 | 01:16:08 +00:38 |
| Roxzone | 06:38 | 01:30:41 | 07:30 -00:52 | 01:30:41 |
Michael Nash completed the 2024 Melbourne Hyrox race with an overall time of 01:30:41, placing him in the top 38% of all athletes and the top 39% in his age group. His total running time was 00:43:58, which was 01:08 faster than the average, indicating a strong running profile. The running segments suggest that Michael has a balanced approach, but his initial pacing was slightly slower, with rapid improvements in subsequent segments. His transitions in the Roxzone were efficient, suggesting good overall fitness. However, strengths were noted in his running and sled push performance, while certain strength-based exercises like sandbag lunges and burpees broad jump indicated areas needing improvement.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Roth Adrian | 2024 Stuttgart | 01:30:49 | |
| Vagedes Jan | 2024 Hamburg | 01:30:27 | |
| Hall James | 2023 London | 01:30:34 | |
| Micallef Brian | 2023 London | 01:30:28 | |
| Schauz Alexander | 2024 Stuttgart | 01:30:19 | |
| Butts Ryan | 2023 Dallas | 01:30:36 | |
| Grothe Marvin | 2021 Berlin | 01:30:16 | |
| Thiry Maarten | 2024 Maastricht | 01:30:19 | |
| Bardet Giovanni | 2024 Marseille | 01:30:57 | |
| Medved Marin | 2022 Frankfurt | 01:30:54 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
