Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Houston using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Loughlin James's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Loughlin James's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Loughlin James's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Loughlin James's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 08:16. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 06:55 | 48:24 to 41:29 | 83.7% |
| Sled Push | 00:50 | 03:31 to 02:41 | 10.1% |
| Sled Pull | 00:16 | 04:52 to 04:36 | 3.2% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:09 | 02:11 to 02:02 | 1.8% |
| Rowing | 00:06 | 04:49 to 04:43 | 1.2% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:21 to 04:21 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 03:33 to 03:33 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:05 to 04:05 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 04:59 to 04:59 | 0.0% |
| Loughlin James | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:02 | 00:00 | 04:35 -00:33 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:21 | 04:02 | 04:26 -00:05 | 04:35 -00:33 |
| Running 2 | 05:21 | 08:23 | 04:56 +00:25 | 09:01 -00:38 |
| Sled Push | 03:31 | 13:44 | 02:52 +00:39 | 13:57 -00:13 |
| Running 3 | 06:34 | 17:15 | 05:23 +01:11 | 16:49 +00:26 |
| Sled Pull | 04:52 | 23:49 | 04:53 -00:01 | 22:12 +01:37 |
| Running 4 | 06:21 | 28:41 | 05:20 +01:01 | 27:05 +01:36 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 03:33 | 35:02 | 05:17 -01:44 | 32:25 +02:37 |
| Running 5 | 06:59 | 38:35 | 05:31 +01:28 | 37:42 +00:53 |
| Rowing | 04:49 | 45:34 | 04:48 +00:01 | 43:13 +02:21 |
| Running 6 | 06:14 | 50:23 | 05:22 +00:52 | 48:01 +02:22 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:11 | 56:37 | 02:10 +00:01 | 53:23 +03:14 |
| Running 7 | 06:12 | 58:48 | 05:22 +00:50 | 55:33 +03:15 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:05 | 01:05:00 | 05:04 -00:59 | 01:00:55 +04:05 |
| Running 8 | 06:45 | 01:09:05 | 05:57 +00:48 | 01:05:59 +03:06 |
| Wall Balls | 04:59 | 01:15:50 | 06:28 -01:29 | 01:11:56 +03:54 |
| Roxzone | 04:30 | 01:25:09 | 06:45 -02:15 | 01:25:09 |
Pacing and Profile:
Based on James' splits and overall running time, it appears that he has a better profile as a runner. His total running time of 00:48:24 is slower than the average, indicating that he could benefit from focusing on improving his running speed and endurance. However, it is worth noting that his best running lap of 00:04:02 is faster than the average, suggesting that he has the potential to excel in this area.
Overall, James Loughlin has shown great potential in the Hyrox race. By implementing the suggested training strategies and techniques, he can improve his performance in the identified areas and continue to excel in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Warren Luke | 2024 Melbourne | 01:25:29 | |
| Thom Owen | 2022 Birmingham | 01:25:05 | |
| Van Der Linde Josh | 2024 Birmingham | 01:24:42 | |
| Krüger Tim | 2019 Hamburg | 01:24:56 | |
| Peskett Jim | 2024 Katowice | 01:25:28 | |
| Wood Benjamin | 2024 Birmingham | 01:24:57 | |
| Mol Lars | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:25:17 | |
| James Antony | 2024 Birmingham | 01:25:29 | |
| Hendricks Terry | 2024 Houston | 01:25:16 | |
| Van Den Berg Mark | 2024 Maastricht | 01:25:14 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Miami | 01:46:55 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
