Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Perth using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 715 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Grohovaz Melanie's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Grohovaz Melanie's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Grohovaz Melanie's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Grohovaz Melanie's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 02:30. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:20 | 06:57 to 05:37 | 53.3% |
| Run Total | 00:56 | 52:12 to 51:16 | 37.3% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:13 | 02:43 to 02:30 | 8.7% |
| Sled Push | 00:01 | 03:08 to 03:07 | 0.7% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 05:10 to 05:10 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 05:44 to 05:44 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 07:07 to 07:07 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:10 to 05:10 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:22 to 05:22 | 0.0% |
| Grohovaz Melanie | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 07:09 | 00:00 | 05:36 +01:33 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:10 | 07:09 | 05:23 -00:13 | 05:36 +01:33 |
| Running 2 | 05:54 | 12:19 | 06:09 -00:15 | 10:59 +01:20 |
| Sled Push | 03:08 | 18:13 | 03:06 +00:02 | 17:08 +01:05 |
| Running 3 | 08:23 | 21:21 | 06:33 +01:50 | 20:14 +01:07 |
| Sled Pull | 05:44 | 29:44 | 06:44 -01:00 | 26:47 +02:57 |
| Running 4 | 06:03 | 35:28 | 06:34 -00:31 | 33:31 +01:57 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:07 | 41:31 | 07:40 -00:33 | 40:05 +01:26 |
| Running 5 | 06:08 | 48:38 | 06:47 -00:39 | 47:45 +00:53 |
| Rowing | 05:10 | 54:46 | 05:42 -00:32 | 54:32 +00:14 |
| Running 6 | 06:14 | 59:56 | 06:40 -00:26 | 01:00:14 -00:18 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:43 | 01:06:10 | 02:34 +00:09 | 01:06:54 -00:44 |
| Running 7 | 06:14 | 01:08:53 | 06:39 -00:25 | 01:09:28 -00:35 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:57 | 01:15:07 | 05:51 +01:06 | 01:16:07 -01:00 |
| Running 8 | 06:10 | 01:22:04 | 07:30 -01:20 | 01:21:58 +00:06 |
| Wall Balls | 05:22 | 01:28:14 | 06:10 -00:48 | 01:29:28 -01:14 |
| Roxzone | 10:42 | 01:44:12 | 08:34 +02:08 | 01:44:12 |
Melanie Grohovaz delivered an impressive performance in the 2024 Perth Hyrox race, securing an overall rank of 181, placing her in the top 26% of all participants, and a rank of 5th in her age group, putting her in the top 15% of her peers. Her total running time was 52 minutes and 12 seconds, which was 1 minute and 4 seconds faster than the average, indicating a strong runner profile. However, her initial start was slower than average, as seen in Running 1 and Running 3, suggesting a slightly conservative start. Nonetheless, she showed consistent improvement in subsequent running segments, highlighting her ability to accelerate and maintain pace effectively.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Roß Sonja | 2022 Essen | 01:44:41 | |
| Garland Louise | 2024 Melbourne | 01:43:48 | |
| Lawton Sarah | 2023 Birmingham | 01:43:46 | |
| Duthoit Elodie | 2023 Rotterdam | 01:44:08 | |
| Hodges Gabriela | 2023 London | 01:44:23 | |
| Harvey Kimberley | 2022 Birmingham | 01:44:33 | |
| Nino Jennifer | 2024 Dallas | 01:43:59 | |
| Montes De Oca Daniela | 2024 Mexico City | 01:43:57 | |
| Schwartzman Becky | 2021 New York | 01:44:03 | |
| Woodward Sarah | 2022 London | 01:44:31 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
