Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Paris using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement.
For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of
334 similar athletes.
This chart provides a visual summary of the race performance, displaying percentile rankings for all running and workout segments. You can quickly see the strength and the weakness of the athlete.
Chart
Line chart with 17 data points.
The chart has 1 X axis displaying categories.
The chart has 1 Y axis displaying values. Data ranges from 1 to 81.
End of interactive chart.
Chart
Line chart with 10 data points.
The chart has 1 X axis displaying categories.
The chart has 1 Y axis displaying values. Data ranges from 1 to 81.
End of interactive chart.
Percentile based on all the athletes who competed in Hyrox Women
Run, Baby, Run!
We stack your running times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you measure up. This chart breaks it down, showing whether you were blazing fast, cruising steady, or losing pace.
It’s all about finding out if your running strategy matched your overall finish time!
Chart
Bar chart with 2 data series.
The chart has 1 X axis displaying categories.
The chart has 1 Y axis displaying values. Data ranges from 201 to 289.
End of interactive chart.
Based on 334 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Women
Station Showdown
We pit your station times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you stack up. This chart shows if you crushed it, coasted, or found that sweet spot for your overall finish time.
Chart
Bar chart with 2 data series.
The chart has 1 X axis displaying categories.
The chart has 1 Y axis displaying values. Data ranges from 109 to 436.
End of interactive chart.
Based on 334 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Women
Fast, slow, or steady?
Here’s the full breakdown of the race, station by station and run by run, stacked against the average of athletes with similar finish times.
In HYROX, pacing is the name of the game. The pacing line shows where you hit the gas, tapped the brakes, or nailed it perfectly—guiding the way to a more balanced and dominant race strategy.
Chart
Combination chart with 2 data series.
Race Comparison
The chart has 1 X axis displaying categories.
The chart has 1 Y axis displaying values. Data ranges from -105 to 174.
End of interactive chart.
Based on 334 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Women
Expected Finish Time
With the RoxCoach Simulation machine, you can see how your predicted finish time evolves as you power through your race. This next-level tech recalculates your estimated finish time after every run and every station.
Crushing the sled pull? Gaining ground on the row? Or holding strong in the Wall Balls? RoxCoach tracks it all, giving you the inside scoop on where you shined and where there’s room to level up.
Chart
Line chart with 2 lines.
Expected Finish Time
The chart has 1 X axis displaying categories.
The chart has 1 Y axis displaying values. Data ranges from 4067 to 4739.
End of interactive chart.
Spread of Splits Time
This chart breaks down the splits for every athlete in the division, giving you a clear look at how times are distributed across the pack.
Compare performance to the competition, spotting where they dominated and where there’s room to improve.
You’ll see how they stack up against the Top 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and beyond. Outliers are out—so the focus stays on the real competition.
Chart
Combination chart with 7 data series.
Column range of splits time
The chart has 1 X axis displaying categories.
The chart has 1 Y axis displaying values. Data ranges from 91 to 831.
End of interactive chart.
Percentile based on all the athletes who competed in Hyrox Women
Improvement Plan
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is
to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve his time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst.
It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance.
Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this performance we identified a possible improvement of
06:46.
Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
Based on 334 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Women
A word from RoxCoach - Your AI Powered Trainer
Overall Performance:
Charlotte Wray achieved an impressive overall rank of 15 out of 2328 athletes, placing her in the top 1% of competitors. She ranked second in her age group (16-24), once again placing her among the elite in her category. Her overall time was 01:10:41, with a total running time of 00:32:41, which was 04:20 faster than average, highlighting her strengths as a runner.
Charlotte's pacing was consistent throughout the race, with her running times consistently faster than average. Her strongest running lap was completed in just 00:03:57. This indicates that she started off strong and maintained a steady pace, without burning out too soon.
However, while her running performance was exceptional, there were a few areas where she was slower than average, indicating potential areas for improvement. These include the Sled Pull, Rowing, and Wall Balls segments.
Segments to Improve:
Sled Pull: Charlotte's time of 00:07:16 was 02:53 slower than the average. To improve in this area, she may benefit from incorporating more strength training into her routine, particularly focused on her back and leg muscles. Exercises such as deadlifts, squats, and kettlebell swings can help to build strength in these areas. She may also benefit from learning proper sled pull technique, ensuring she uses her whole body to pull the sled, rather than just her arms.
Rowing: Her time of 00:05:07 was 00:12 slower than average. To improve her rowing time, Charlotte should focus on improving her rowing technique and building her endurance. High-intensity interval training (HIIT) on the rowing machine can be a beneficial way to increase her stamina and power. Additionally, she could benefit from strength training exercises that target the back, shoulders, and arms, such as rows, pull-ups, and overhead presses.
Wall Balls: With a time of 00:04:12, Charlotte was 00:49 slower than the average. To improve her performance in this area, she should incorporate more functional training exercises into her routine, such as squats, lunges, and plyometric exercises. Practicing the wall ball exercise with varying weights may also help improve her strength and technique.
Roxzone: Charlotte's time in the Roxzone was 00:24 slower than average, suggesting she might be taking longer to rest or transition between exercises. High-intensity circuit training could help improve her fitness and transition times. This should include shorter rest periods between exercises to mimic the conditions of the race.
Race Strategies:
Charlotte's performance indicates that she is an excellent runner, and she should continue to capitalize on this during her races. However, she could potentially gain significant time by improving her performance in the slower segments. One strategy could be to conserve a bit more energy during the running segments to allow for more power and speed during the strength-based exercises. Additionally, focusing on improving transition times between exercises could also lead to better overall times. Charlotte should also consider practicing running after endurance and strength exercises to simulate race conditions and prepare her body for the shifts in exercise type during the race.