Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Paris using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 153 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Winter Fran's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Winter Fran's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Winter Fran's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Winter Fran's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 02:56. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 01:03 | 45:53 to 44:50 | 35.8% |
| Sled Pull | 00:59 | 08:07 to 07:08 | 33.5% |
| Wall Balls | 00:31 | 07:34 to 07:03 | 17.6% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:12 | 05:51 to 05:39 | 6.8% |
| Rowing | 00:08 | 05:22 to 05:14 | 4.5% |
| Ski Erg | 00:03 | 05:00 to 04:57 | 1.7% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 03:35 to 03:35 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:47 to 02:47 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 05:01 to 05:01 | 0.0% |
| Winter Fran | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:42 | 00:00 | 04:58 -00:16 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:00 | 04:42 | 04:57 +00:03 | 04:58 -00:16 |
| Running 2 | 05:20 | 09:42 | 05:17 +00:03 | 09:55 -00:13 |
| Sled Push | 03:35 | 15:02 | 04:21 -00:46 | 15:12 -00:10 |
| Running 3 | 06:03 | 18:37 | 05:44 +00:19 | 19:33 -00:56 |
| Sled Pull | 08:07 | 24:40 | 07:21 +00:46 | 25:17 -00:37 |
| Running 4 | 05:49 | 32:47 | 05:44 +00:05 | 32:38 +00:09 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:51 | 38:36 | 05:42 +00:09 | 38:22 +00:14 |
| Running 5 | 05:45 | 44:27 | 05:52 -00:07 | 44:04 +00:23 |
| Rowing | 05:22 | 50:12 | 05:15 +00:07 | 49:56 +00:16 |
| Running 6 | 05:48 | 55:34 | 05:47 +00:01 | 55:11 +00:23 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:47 | 01:01:22 | 02:59 -00:12 | 01:00:58 +00:24 |
| Running 7 | 06:01 | 01:04:09 | 05:53 +00:08 | 01:03:57 +00:12 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:01 | 01:10:10 | 05:46 -00:45 | 01:09:50 +00:20 |
| Running 8 | 06:29 | 01:15:11 | 06:19 +00:10 | 01:15:36 -00:25 |
| Wall Balls | 07:34 | 01:21:40 | 07:12 +00:22 | 01:21:55 -00:15 |
| Roxzone | 06:57 | 01:36:03 | 06:56 +00:01 | 01:36:03 |
Fran Winter demonstrated a strong performance with a top 22% overall rank and a 16% rank in her age group. Her overall time was 01:36:03, showing a competitive edge amongst 259 athletes. Fran managed to maintain a consistent pace throughout the race, neither starting too fast nor too slow. Her total running time was on par with the average, indicating a well-balanced athlete with strengths in both running and strength-based tasks.
The first four segments of the race were particularly notable, with Fran starting strong in Running 1 and excelling in the Sled Push. This shows that her initial energy levels and strength were high, setting a positive tone for her race.
For future races, Fran should consider implementing the following strategies:
By focusing on these areas of improvement and implementing these strategies, Fran has the potential to significantly improve her performance in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Zielasko Julia | 2022 Berlin | 01:36:28 | |
| Edgeworth Emma | 2024 Birmingham | 01:36:03 | |
| Miller Samantha | 2023 London | 01:35:36 | |
| Johnson Linda | 2023 Manchester | 01:36:23 | |
| Haynes Laura | 2022 London | 01:35:57 | |
| Phipps Abbie | 2024 World Championships Nice | 01:35:36 | |
| Hardy Kayla | 2024 Melbourne | 01:35:56 | |
| Casasanta Rachel | 2020 Dallas | 01:36:10 | |
| Huber Andrea | World Championships | 01:35:38 | |
| O Brien Michelle | 2024 Marseille | 01:36:26 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Copenhagen | 01:41:57 | |
| 2024 Malaga | 01:41:57 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
