Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Ciudad de Mexico using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire OHearn Tim's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights OHearn Tim's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the OHearn Tim's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve OHearn Tim's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 08:33. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 02:43 | 07:31 to 04:48 | 31.8% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 02:14 | 06:03 to 03:49 | 26.1% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:15 | 05:10 to 03:55 | 14.6% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:52 | 02:33 to 01:41 | 10.1% |
| Sled Push | 00:33 | 02:43 to 02:10 | 6.4% |
| Sled Pull | 00:20 | 04:05 to 03:45 | 3.9% |
| Rowing | 00:20 | 04:46 to 04:26 | 3.9% |
| Ski Erg | 00:16 | 04:23 to 04:07 | 3.1% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 34:03 to 34:03 | 0.0% |
| OHearn Tim | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:44 | 00:00 | 04:10 +00:34 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:23 | 04:44 | 04:16 +00:07 | 04:10 +00:34 |
| Running 2 | 03:48 | 09:07 | 04:27 -00:39 | 08:26 +00:41 |
| Sled Push | 02:43 | 12:55 | 02:34 +00:09 | 12:53 +00:02 |
| Running 3 | 04:04 | 15:38 | 04:49 -00:45 | 15:27 +00:11 |
| Sled Pull | 04:05 | 19:42 | 04:12 -00:07 | 20:16 -00:34 |
| Running 4 | 04:09 | 23:47 | 04:46 -00:37 | 24:28 -00:41 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:03 | 27:56 | 04:22 +01:41 | 29:14 -01:18 |
| Running 5 | 04:40 | 33:59 | 04:54 -00:14 | 33:36 +00:23 |
| Rowing | 04:46 | 38:39 | 04:33 +00:13 | 38:30 +00:09 |
| Running 6 | 04:09 | 43:25 | 04:48 -00:39 | 43:03 +00:22 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:33 | 47:34 | 01:55 +00:38 | 47:51 -00:17 |
| Running 7 | 04:04 | 50:07 | 04:48 -00:44 | 49:46 +00:21 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:10 | 54:11 | 04:20 +00:50 | 54:34 -00:23 |
| Running 8 | 04:30 | 59:21 | 05:10 -00:40 | 58:54 +00:27 |
| Wall Balls | 07:31 | 01:03:51 | 05:25 +02:06 | 01:04:04 -00:13 |
| Roxzone | 03:47 | 01:14:58 | 05:29 -01:42 | 01:14:58 |
Tim O'Hearn demonstrated an impressive performance in the 2024 Hyrox Ciudad de Mexico event, securing a Top 4% position out of 905 athletes. He particularly excelled in his Total running time, finishing 04:02 faster than average which indicates a strong runner's profile. His overall pacing seemed to be well managed, as observed in the consistency of his running times across all segments. However, there appears to be room for improvement in transitioning, strength exercises, and maintaining momentum post strength-based activities.
The following segments stand out as areas for improvement:
Considering Tim's performance, the following strategies could potentially enhance his race performance:
By implementing these strategies and focusing on the identified areas for improvement, Tim O'Hearn has the potential to significantly improve his future Hyrox performances.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Tabb Rory | 2023 London | 01:14:31 | |
| Manning Douglas | 2024 Dallas | 01:15:02 | |
| Morris Henry | 2024 London | 01:15:11 | |
| Van De Haar Pinto Vasco | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:14:38 | |
| Mattei Alessandro | 2023 Milan | 01:15:02 | |
| MiltonWhite Teddy | 2024 London | 01:14:36 | |
| Barroso Pujana Aitor | 2023 Barcelona | 01:14:36 | |
| Sifuentez Jayson | 2022 Dallas | 01:14:56 | |
| Scott Darren | 2023 Rotterdam | 01:15:18 | |
| Brignoli Simone | 2024 Milan | 01:14:59 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
