Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Paris using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement.
For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of
1000 similar athletes.
This chart provides a visual summary of the race performance, displaying percentile rankings for all running and workout segments. You can quickly see the strength and the weakness of the athlete.
Percentile based on all the athletes who competed in Hyrox Men
Running
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times.
This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
Based on 1000 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Men
Workouts
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times.
This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
Based on 1000 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Men
Pacing Quality
This section showcases the entire O'Reilly Dave's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights O'Reilly Dave's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
Based on 1000 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Men
Spread of Splits Time
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the O'Reilly Dave's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Percentile based on all the athletes who competed in Hyrox Men
Improvement Plan
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is
to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve O'Reilly Dave's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst.
It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance.
Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of
04:04.
Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
Based on 1000 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Men
A word from RoxCoach - Your AI Powered Trainer
Overall Performance:
Dave O'Reilly exhibited an impressive performance in the HYROX race, with his overall rank placing him in the top 80% of all athletes. His standout strength lies in running, as evidenced by his total running time being a full 03:13 faster than the average. He demonstrated a fast start, with all his running segments from running 1 to running 4 faster than the average. This suggests that Dave begins his races at a high pace. However, his performance in strength-focused segments like the sled push, sled pull, burpees broad jump, and sandbag lunges was less stellar, indicating that Dave may benefit from a more balanced training approach that equally emphasizes both running and strength.
Segments to Improve:
Roxzone: Dave’s Roxzone time is slower than the average, suggesting that he may be taking more rest time or struggling with transitions. He could improve his overall fitness and transition time through high-intensity interval training (HIIT) workouts that mimic the race's alternating exercise-running structure. This could help increase his stamina and reduce his transition times.
Sled Push & Sled Pull: Dave’s performances in these segments were slower than average, indicating a need for strength improvement in both lower and upper body. Specific exercises could include weighted squats, sled pushes/pulls, and upper body pull exercises such as lat pull downs and pull-ups.
Burpees Broad Jump: Slower performance in this area may be due to lack of explosive strength. Plyometric exercises like box jumps, and strength training exercises, such as deadlifts and squats, could help improve performance on this segment.
Sandbag Lunges: This slower performance may indicate an area of weakness in lower body strength and endurance. Lunges with weights or resistance training targeting the legs and core could be beneficial.
Farmers Carry: Dave’s slower than average time in this segment suggests a need for improvement in grip strength and full-body stability. Incorporating grip strength exercises and full-body workouts into his training routine could help improve performance in this area.
Race Strategies:
Considering Dave's better than average running performance, he might consider starting the race at a slightly slower pace to conserve energy for the strength segments and reduce fatigue in later stages of the race. Additionally, focusing on transition techniques between running and strength segments could help shave off valuable seconds from his overall time. Finally, implementing a comprehensive training program that focuses on both running and strength could help Dave develop into a more well-rounded athlete capable of performing better in both types of segments.