Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Paris using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We stack your running times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you measure up. This chart breaks it down, showing whether you were blazing fast, cruising steady, or losing pace.
It’s all about finding out if your running strategy matched your overall finish time!
We pit your station times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you stack up. This chart shows if you crushed it, coasted, or found that sweet spot for your overall finish time.
Here’s the full breakdown of the race, station by station and run by run, stacked against the average of athletes with similar finish times.
In HYROX, pacing is the name of the game. The pacing line shows where you hit the gas, tapped the brakes, or nailed it perfectly—guiding the way to a more balanced and dominant race strategy.
With the RoxCoach Simulation machine, you can see how your predicted finish time evolves as you power through your race. This next-level tech recalculates your estimated finish time after every run and every station. Crushing the sled pull? Gaining ground on the row? Or holding strong in the Wall Balls? RoxCoach tracks it all, giving you the inside scoop on where you shined and where there’s room to level up.
This chart breaks down the splits for every athlete in the division, giving you a clear look at how times are distributed across the pack.
Compare performance to the competition, spotting where they dominated and where there’s room to improve.
You’ll see how they stack up against the Top 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and beyond. Outliers are out—so the focus stays on the real competition.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve his time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:47. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|
| BBJ | 01:05 (From 04:27 to 03:22) | 28.6% |
| Sled Push | 00:51 (From 02:48 to 01:57) | 22.5% |
| Sled Pull | 00:46 (From 04:11 to 03:25) | 20.3% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:24 (From 03:57 to 03:33) | 10.6% |
| Ski Erg | 00:19 (From 04:20 to 04:01) | 8.4% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:16 (From 01:49 to 01:33) | 7.0% |
| Rowing | 00:06 (From 04:25 to 04:19) | 2.6% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 (From 04:09 to 04:09) | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 (From 33:01 to 33:01) | 0.0% |
| Masson Gaël | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:36 | 00:00 | 03:53 -00:17 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:20 | 03:36 | 04:09 +00:11 | 03:53 -00:17 |
| Running 2 | 03:59 | 07:56 | 04:06 -00:07 | 08:02 -00:06 |
| Sled Push | 02:48 | 11:55 | 02:23 +00:25 | 12:08 -00:13 |
| Running 3 | 03:59 | 14:43 | 04:23 -00:24 | 14:31 +00:12 |
| Sled Pull | 04:11 | 18:42 | 03:46 +00:25 | 18:54 -00:12 |
| Running 4 | 04:06 | 22:53 | 04:23 -00:17 | 22:40 +00:13 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:27 | 26:59 | 03:45 +00:42 | 27:03 -00:04 |
| Running 5 | 04:21 | 31:26 | 04:29 -00:08 | 30:48 +00:38 |
| Rowing | 04:25 | 35:47 | 04:23 +00:02 | 35:17 +00:30 |
| Running 6 | 04:09 | 40:12 | 04:24 -00:15 | 39:40 +00:32 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:49 | 44:21 | 01:44 +00:05 | 44:04 +00:17 |
| Running 7 | 04:14 | 46:10 | 04:23 -00:09 | 45:48 +00:22 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:57 | 50:24 | 03:50 +00:07 | 50:11 +00:13 |
| Running 8 | 04:40 | 54:21 | 04:40 +00:00 | 54:01 +00:20 |
| Wall Balls | 04:09 | 59:01 | 04:47 -00:38 | 58:41 +00:20 |
| Roxzone | 05:06 | 01:08:10 | 04:42 +00:24 | 01:08:10 |
Gaël Masson performed exceptionally well in the Paris 2024 HYROX race, ranking in the top 6% of both his age group and overall. His total running time was 1:53 faster than average, indicating a strong running profile. However, his roxzone time was slower than average, suggesting a need for improvement in transitions and overall fitness.
His pacing was generally commendable, having started at a pace faster than average in the first running segment. He maintained this pace advantage throughout most of the running segments, with a noticeable peak performance in Running 3 where he was 26 seconds faster than average. His performance in strength-related exercises showed areas of improvement, as his times were slower than average. His performance also seemed to wane towards the end of the race, evident in the Sandbag Lunges and Roxzone segments.
For better race performance, Gaël could consider the following strategies:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Burns Daniel | 2024 Manchester | 01:07:40 | |
| Kühn Philipp | 2022 Karlsruhe | 01:08:21 | |
| Mcinally Steven | 2024 Glasgow | 01:07:43 | |
| Jones Lewis | 2022 Manchester | 01:07:48 | |
| Tekolf Timo | 2023 Karlsruhe | 01:08:09 | |
| Gardner Adam | 2023 Glasgow | 01:07:40 | |
| Lomas Richard | 2024 Bilbao | 01:08:14 | |
| Jose Gonzalvo Albert | 2023 Barcelona | 01:08:20 | |
| Vergote Daniel | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:08:07 | |
| Power Andrew | 2024 Malaga | 01:08:22 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
Masson Gaël
