Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Hamburg using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Kusk Daniel's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Kusk Daniel's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Kusk Daniel's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Kusk Daniel's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:54. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 03:07 | 52:14 to 49:07 | 63.6% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:12 | 07:59 to 06:47 | 24.5% |
| Wall Balls | 00:25 | 08:35 to 08:10 | 8.5% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:08 | 06:24 to 06:16 | 2.7% |
| Rowing | 00:02 | 05:12 to 05:10 | 0.7% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:31 to 04:31 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:14 to 02:14 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:04 to 04:04 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:08 to 02:08 | 0.0% |
| Kusk Daniel | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 06:28 | 00:00 | 05:12 +01:16 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:31 | 06:28 | 04:42 -00:11 | 05:12 +01:16 |
| Running 2 | 06:11 | 10:59 | 05:43 +00:28 | 09:54 +01:05 |
| Sled Push | 02:14 | 17:10 | 03:30 -01:16 | 15:37 +01:33 |
| Running 3 | 06:36 | 19:24 | 06:18 +00:18 | 19:07 +00:17 |
| Sled Pull | 04:04 | 26:00 | 06:03 -01:59 | 25:25 +00:35 |
| Running 4 | 06:25 | 30:04 | 06:17 +00:08 | 31:28 -01:24 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:59 | 36:29 | 06:56 +01:03 | 37:45 -01:16 |
| Running 5 | 06:15 | 44:28 | 06:33 -00:18 | 44:41 -00:13 |
| Rowing | 05:12 | 50:43 | 05:12 +00:00 | 51:14 -00:31 |
| Running 6 | 06:27 | 55:55 | 06:22 +00:05 | 56:26 -00:31 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:08 | 01:02:22 | 02:35 -00:27 | 01:02:48 -00:26 |
| Running 7 | 06:25 | 01:04:30 | 06:20 +00:05 | 01:05:23 -00:53 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:24 | 01:10:55 | 06:25 -00:01 | 01:11:43 -00:48 |
| Running 8 | 07:31 | 01:17:19 | 07:30 +00:01 | 01:18:08 -00:49 |
| Wall Balls | 08:35 | 01:24:50 | 08:22 +00:13 | 01:25:38 -00:48 |
| Roxzone | 09:48 | 01:43:05 | 09:05 +00:43 | 01:43:05 |
Daniel Kusk, who belongs to the age group 40-44, displayed a mixture of strengths and weaknesses in his performance at the 2024 Hamburg Hyrox race. Overall, he ranked in the top 84% of 1247 athletes and in the top 85% of 175 athletes in his age group. His total running time was 52 minutes and 14 seconds, which was 1 minute and 47 seconds slower than the average. Further, his best running lap was 6 minutes and 11 seconds.
Observations suggest that Daniel has a stronger aptitude for strength-based activities than running. This is reflected in his superior performance in segments such as the Ski Erg, Sled Push, Sled Pull, and Farmers Carry. However, his overall running time and performance in the initial running segments indicate a need for improved running endurance and pacing strategies.
Based on the race data, Daniel should focus on improving the following segments:
While Daniel has shown potential in many areas, there are several strategies he could implement for better race performance:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Breinl Daniel | 2021 Leipzig | 01:42:46 | |
| Tonkin Oliver | 2023 London | 01:43:03 | |
| Klitmøller Anders | 2024 Copenhagen | 01:42:40 | |
| Mccluskey Luke | 2024 Melbourne | 01:43:17 | |
| Ziobro Chris | 2022 London | 01:42:55 | |
| Dick Vitali | 2021 Berlin | 01:42:37 | |
| Tassistro Roberto | 2024 Rimini | 01:43:10 | |
| Pegoraro Alberto | 2023 Rimini | 01:43:09 | |
| Macheta Maciej | 2022 London | 01:42:45 | |
| Evans Gareth | 2023 Stuttgart | 01:42:46 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Copenhagen | 01:45:02 | |
| 2024 Malaga | 01:45:02 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
