Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Sydney using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement.
For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of
1000 similar athletes.
This chart provides a visual summary of the race performance, displaying percentile rankings for all running and workout segments. You can quickly see the strength and the weakness of the athlete.
Percentile based on all the athletes who competed in Hyrox Men
Running
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times.
This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
Based on 1000 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Men
Workouts
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times.
This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
Based on 1000 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Men
Pacing Quality
This section showcases the entire Kruppa Jan's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Kruppa Jan's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
Based on 1000 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Men
Spread of Splits Time
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Kruppa Jan's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Percentile based on all the athletes who competed in Hyrox Men
Improvement Plan
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is
to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Kruppa Jan's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst.
It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance.
Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of
07:14.
Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
Based on 1000 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Men
A word from RoxCoach - Your AI Powered Trainer
Overall Performance
Jan Kruppa demonstrated a strong overall performance in the 2024 Sydney Hyrox event, with an impressive rank of 132 out of 1059 athletes, placing him in the top 12%. In his age group (30-34), Jan ranked 35th out of 239, which positions him in the top 14%. His total time for the event was 01:13:34. Notably, Jan excels in strength-based exercises, evident from his exceptional performance in the Sled Push and Pull. However, his total running time was 00:39:23, which is 01:51 slower than average, suggesting that running is an area for improvement. Jan's pacing strategy appeared to be reasonably balanced, with a fast start but a noticeable slowdown in the later running segments, indicating potential fatigue or a need for better energy management.
Segments to Improve
Total Running Time:
Jan's total running time indicates a need for enhanced endurance and speed. To address this, Jan should focus on interval training to improve pace and stamina. Incorporating hill sprints, tempo runs, and long-distance endurance runs can significantly boost running efficiency.
Burpees Broad Jump:
This segment was significantly slower than average. Jan should include plyometric training to improve explosive power and agility. Drills such as box jumps, squat jumps, and burpee variations can enhance performance in this area. Focusing on core strength and flexibility will also aid in maintaining form during the exercise.
Sandbag Lunges:
Improvement in this segment can be achieved through specific strength training exercises. Jan should incorporate lunges with varying weights and step-up exercises to improve leg strength and balance. Additionally, practicing sandbag-specific exercises can help in familiarizing with the movement and weight distribution.
Race Strategies
Energy Management:
Jan should aim to start at a moderate pace and maintain a consistent speed throughout the running segments to avoid fatigue in later stages. Implementing a negative split strategy, where the race is finished faster than it started, can be beneficial.
Transition Optimization:
Although the Roxzone time was faster than average, further improvement can be achieved by practicing quick transitions in training. This involves rehearsing the quick switch between different exercises to minimize downtime during the race.
Compromised Running Scenarios:
Jan should simulate race conditions where running is immediately followed by intense strength exercises in training. This will prepare him for the physical demands of transitioning between different types of exertion during the race.