Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Paris using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 933 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Johnson Emily's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Johnson Emily's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Johnson Emily's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Johnson Emily's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:17. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 01:04 | 04:28 to 03:24 | 24.9% |
| Sled Pull | 01:03 | 05:25 to 04:22 | 24.5% |
| Run Total | 00:48 | 40:19 to 39:31 | 18.7% |
| Sled Push | 00:23 | 02:26 to 02:03 | 8.9% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:18 | 04:01 to 03:43 | 7.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:17 | 04:43 to 04:26 | 6.6% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:13 | 02:03 to 01:50 | 5.1% |
| Ski Erg | 00:08 | 04:50 to 04:42 | 3.1% |
| Rowing | 00:03 | 04:59 to 04:56 | 1.2% |
| Johnson Emily | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:11 | 00:00 | 04:36 -00:25 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:50 | 04:11 | 04:52 -00:02 | 04:36 -00:25 |
| Running 2 | 04:59 | 09:01 | 04:54 +00:05 | 09:28 -00:27 |
| Sled Push | 02:26 | 14:00 | 02:28 -00:02 | 14:22 -00:22 |
| Running 3 | 05:08 | 16:26 | 05:09 -00:01 | 16:50 -00:24 |
| Sled Pull | 05:25 | 21:34 | 04:56 +00:29 | 21:59 -00:25 |
| Running 4 | 05:13 | 26:59 | 05:09 +00:04 | 26:55 +00:04 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:43 | 32:12 | 05:00 -00:17 | 32:04 +00:08 |
| Running 5 | 05:14 | 36:55 | 05:15 -00:01 | 37:04 -00:09 |
| Rowing | 04:59 | 42:09 | 05:05 -00:06 | 42:19 -00:10 |
| Running 6 | 05:04 | 47:08 | 05:12 -00:08 | 47:24 -00:16 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:03 | 52:12 | 02:01 +00:02 | 52:36 -00:24 |
| Running 7 | 05:03 | 54:15 | 05:10 -00:07 | 54:37 -00:22 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:01 | 59:18 | 04:05 -00:04 | 59:47 -00:29 |
| Running 8 | 05:31 | 01:03:19 | 05:28 +00:03 | 01:03:52 -00:33 |
| Wall Balls | 04:28 | 01:08:50 | 04:05 +00:23 | 01:09:20 -00:30 |
| Roxzone | 05:54 | 01:19:02 | 05:37 +00:17 | 01:19:02 |
Emily Johnson demonstrated an impressive performance at the 2024 Paris Hyrox Race. She ranked within the top 3% of both all athletes and her age group. Her overall time was 1:19:02, which is a commendable achievement. Emily's total running time of 40:19 was 44 seconds faster than the average, suggesting she has a strong runner profile. Her best running lap was completed in 4:59.
Emily started the race with a strong pace, running the first segment 24 seconds faster than the average. However, her pacing appeared to slow down slightly in the middle of the race, particularly during the sled pull and wall balls segments which were slower than average. As she entered the final stages of the race, her speed recovered, which indicates a solid endurance level.
Given Emily's strong running performance, she should leverage this strength during the race. She could consider starting at a slightly slower pace to conserve energy for the middle segments where her performance tends to drop. Additionally, focusing on quick and efficient transitions between exercises could help to save time.
Post specific exercises, Emily should pay attention to stretching and recovery to ensure she's ready for the next segment. Particularly after strength-intensive segments, a few minutes of active recovery could help to prevent fatigue and maintain performance levels throughout the race.
Finally, incorporating specific training for the wall balls and sled pull segments into her routine could help to turn these weaker areas into strengths, and improve her overall time.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Baluyot Jessa | 2024 Melbourne | 01:19:03 | |
| Frede Bente | 2023 Paris | 01:19:11 | |
| Kaiser Natalie | 2022 Chicago | 01:19:02 | |
| Shirley Paula | 2024 Melbourne | 01:18:43 | |
| Yapp Jess | 2023 Birmingham | 01:18:47 | |
| Caballero Alvaro Laura | 2023 Bilbao | 01:19:11 | |
| Newman Michelle | 2023 Melbourne | 01:18:39 | |
| Breman Elselien | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:19:27 | |
| Tanck Alexandra | 2022 Hamburg | 01:18:34 | |
| Cheng Michelle | 2022 Los Angeles | 01:18:52 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
