Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Jacks Chris's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Jacks Chris's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Jacks Chris's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Jacks Chris's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:18. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:02 | 44:31 to 42:29 | 47.3% |
| Wall Balls | 01:55 | 08:12 to 06:17 | 44.6% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:14 | 05:26 to 05:12 | 5.4% |
| Ski Erg | 00:07 | 04:32 to 04:25 | 2.7% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:37 to 02:37 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 03:58 to 03:58 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:45 to 04:45 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:54 to 01:54 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:10 to 04:10 | 0.0% |
| Jacks Chris | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 06:05 | 00:00 | 04:42 +01:23 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:32 | 06:05 | 04:28 +00:04 | 04:42 +01:23 |
| Running 2 | 05:21 | 10:37 | 05:03 +00:18 | 09:10 +01:27 |
| Sled Push | 02:37 | 15:58 | 02:57 -00:20 | 14:13 +01:45 |
| Running 3 | 05:14 | 18:35 | 05:29 -00:15 | 17:10 +01:25 |
| Sled Pull | 03:58 | 23:49 | 05:02 -01:04 | 22:39 +01:10 |
| Running 4 | 05:27 | 27:47 | 05:29 -00:02 | 27:41 +00:06 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:26 | 33:14 | 05:27 -00:01 | 33:10 +00:04 |
| Running 5 | 05:21 | 38:40 | 05:40 -00:19 | 38:37 +00:03 |
| Rowing | 04:45 | 44:01 | 04:52 -00:07 | 44:17 -00:16 |
| Running 6 | 05:22 | 48:46 | 05:31 -00:09 | 49:09 -00:23 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:54 | 54:08 | 02:13 -00:19 | 54:40 -00:32 |
| Running 7 | 05:42 | 56:02 | 05:29 +00:13 | 56:53 -00:51 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:10 | 01:01:44 | 05:13 -01:03 | 01:02:22 -00:38 |
| Running 8 | 06:04 | 01:05:54 | 06:08 -00:04 | 01:07:35 -01:41 |
| Wall Balls | 08:12 | 01:11:58 | 06:40 +01:32 | 01:13:43 -01:45 |
| Roxzone | 07:26 | 01:27:27 | 07:04 +00:22 | 01:27:27 |
Chris Jacks showed an admirable performance in the 2024 Birmingham HYROX event. His overall rank of 1512 places him in the top 36% of all athletes, demonstrating a high level of fitness and determination. Specifically, his performance in the age group 50-54 was impressive, ranking 52, in the top 22% of his peers.
It is worth noting that Chris showed more strength in the strength-based segments of the race as compared to the running segments. His total running time was slower than the average by 00:45. This suggests that while Chris is a strong competitor, there is room for improvement in his running speed and endurance. He also appeared to start the race at a slower pace as indicated by his slower than average time in Running 1. However, he maintained a consistent pace throughout the race which is a good strategy to prevent early fatigue.
Improving race performance is not only about physical training but also about implementing effective race strategies. Here are some strategies that Chris could consider for future races:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Nosworthy Samuel | 2024 Copenhagen | 01:27:05 | |
| Pleikys Laimantas | 2024 Katowice | 01:27:56 | |
| Mcnamara Dean | 2024 Melbourne | 01:27:51 | |
| Ramez Valentin | 2024 Ciudad de Mexico | 01:27:31 | |
| Geitzenauer Thomas | 2024 Malaga | 01:27:11 | |
| Bell Leon | 2023 Birmingham | 01:27:54 | |
| Frank Christian | 2024 Berlin | 01:27:36 | |
| Cokely Ryan | 2022 New York | 01:27:15 | |
| Panzenbock Scott | 2024 Sydney | 01:27:10 | |
| Roberto Samuele | 2023 Milan | 01:27:30 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
