Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Paris using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 287 similar athletes.
We stack your running times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you measure up. This chart breaks it down, showing whether you were blazing fast, cruising steady, or losing pace.
It’s all about finding out if your running strategy matched your overall finish time!
We pit your station times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you stack up. This chart shows if you crushed it, coasted, or found that sweet spot for your overall finish time.
Here’s the full breakdown of the race, station by station and run by run, stacked against the average of athletes with similar finish times.
In HYROX, pacing is the name of the game. The pacing line shows where you hit the gas, tapped the brakes, or nailed it perfectly—guiding the way to a more balanced and dominant race strategy.
With the RoxCoach Simulation machine, you can see how your predicted finish time evolves as you power through your race. This next-level tech recalculates your estimated finish time after every run and every station. Crushing the sled pull? Gaining ground on the row? Or holding strong in the Wall Balls? RoxCoach tracks it all, giving you the inside scoop on where you shined and where there’s room to level up.
This chart breaks down the splits for every athlete in the division, giving you a clear look at how times are distributed across the pack.
Compare performance to the competition, spotting where they dominated and where there’s room to improve.
You’ll see how they stack up against the Top 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and beyond. Outliers are out—so the focus stays on the real competition.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve his time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 08:31. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 03:05 (From 58:37 to 55:32) | 36.2% |
| Sled Pull | 03:02 (From 10:13 to 07:11) | 35.6% |
| Wall Balls | 01:23 (From 11:27 to 10:04) | 16.2% |
| BBJ | 01:01 (From 09:17 to 08:16) | 11.9% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 (From 04:53 to 04:53) | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 (From 04:10 to 04:10) | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 (From 05:26 to 05:26) | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 (From 03:03 to 03:03) | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 (From 07:06 to 07:06) | 0.0% |
| Hucafol Denis | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:34 | 00:00 | 05:54 -00:20 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:53 | 05:34 | 04:57 -00:04 | 05:54 -00:20 |
| Running 2 | 06:29 | 10:27 | 06:35 -00:06 | 10:51 -00:24 |
| Sled Push | 04:10 | 16:56 | 04:07 +00:03 | 17:26 -00:30 |
| Running 3 | 07:52 | 21:06 | 07:26 +00:26 | 21:33 -00:27 |
| Sled Pull | 10:13 | 28:58 | 07:14 +02:59 | 28:59 -00:01 |
| Running 4 | 07:39 | 39:11 | 07:22 +00:17 | 36:13 +02:58 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 09:17 | 46:50 | 08:38 +00:39 | 43:35 +03:15 |
| Running 5 | 07:32 | 56:07 | 07:46 -00:14 | 52:13 +03:54 |
| Rowing | 05:26 | 01:03:39 | 05:37 -00:11 | 59:59 +03:40 |
| Running 6 | 07:22 | 01:09:05 | 07:29 -00:07 | 01:05:36 +03:29 |
| Farmers Carry | 03:03 | 01:16:27 | 03:00 +00:03 | 01:13:05 +03:22 |
| Running 7 | 07:35 | 01:19:30 | 07:38 -00:03 | 01:16:05 +03:25 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 07:06 | 01:27:05 | 08:06 -01:00 | 01:23:43 +03:22 |
| Running 8 | 08:38 | 01:34:11 | 09:38 -01:00 | 01:31:49 +02:22 |
| Wall Balls | 11:27 | 01:42:49 | 10:21 +01:06 | 01:41:27 +01:22 |
| Roxzone | 09:15 | 02:03:24 | 11:36 -02:21 | 02:03:24 |
Denis Hucafol, a male athlete from the age group 40-44, placed in the top 96% overall and top 97% in his age group at the 2024 Paris HYROX event. His overall time was 02:03:24, exhibiting a commendable performance. His total running time was 00:58:37, which was 1:30 faster than the average, indicating that Denis is stronger in his running. This is further corroborated by his best running lap time of 00:06:29. In terms of pacing, Denis started off the race faster than average but lost some momentum during the middle segments. However, he managed to regain his pace towards the end.
While Denis performed well overall, there are few segments where he could improve. The three segments with the most potential for improvement are the Sled Pull, Wall Balls, and the Burpees Broad Jump.
For better performance in future races, Denis should consider the following strategies:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Janßen Arne | 2022 München | 02:03:50 | |
| Husamo Alberto | 2024 Dubai | 02:03:44 | |
| Morrison Carl | 2024 Brisbane | 02:03:08 | |
| Bonney David | 2024 Sydney | 02:03:06 | |
| Grund Stephan | 2024 Karlsruhe | 02:03:19 | |
| Brignull Enda | 2022 London | 02:03:43 | |
| Maynard Matthew | 2022 London | 02:03:02 | |
| Le Seigle Kieran | 2024 Marseille | 02:03:30 | |
| Lilley Steve | 2023 Manchester | 02:03:39 | |
| Castro Rodriguez Jesus | 2024 Mexico City | 02:02:59 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Paris Hucafol Denis, Lanoes Cyril | 01:20:58 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
Hucafol Denis
