Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Brisbane using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Hay Andrew's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Hay Andrew's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Hay Andrew's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Hay Andrew's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:37. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:22 | 07:07 to 05:45 | 29.6% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:04 | 06:30 to 05:26 | 23.1% |
| Sled Pull | 00:59 | 06:11 to 05:12 | 21.3% |
| Wall Balls | 00:47 | 07:42 to 06:55 | 17.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:15 | 02:31 to 02:16 | 5.4% |
| Rowing | 00:10 | 05:05 to 04:55 | 3.6% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:19 to 04:19 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:55 to 02:55 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 44:29 to 44:29 | 0.0% |
| Hay Andrew | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:29 | 00:00 | 04:52 -01:23 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:19 | 03:29 | 04:33 -00:14 | 04:52 -01:23 |
| Running 2 | 05:07 | 07:48 | 05:19 -00:12 | 09:25 -01:37 |
| Sled Push | 02:55 | 12:55 | 03:09 -00:14 | 14:44 -01:49 |
| Running 3 | 05:28 | 15:50 | 05:47 -00:19 | 17:53 -02:03 |
| Sled Pull | 06:11 | 21:18 | 05:25 +00:46 | 23:40 -02:22 |
| Running 4 | 05:56 | 27:29 | 05:47 +00:09 | 29:05 -01:36 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:07 | 33:25 | 06:02 +01:05 | 34:52 -01:27 |
| Running 5 | 05:58 | 40:32 | 05:59 -00:01 | 40:54 -00:22 |
| Rowing | 05:05 | 46:30 | 04:58 +00:07 | 46:53 -00:23 |
| Running 6 | 05:59 | 51:35 | 05:49 +00:10 | 51:51 -00:16 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:31 | 57:34 | 02:21 +00:10 | 57:40 -00:06 |
| Running 7 | 06:03 | 01:00:05 | 05:48 +00:15 | 01:00:01 +00:04 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:30 | 01:06:08 | 05:39 +00:51 | 01:05:49 +00:19 |
| Running 8 | 06:32 | 01:12:38 | 06:35 -00:03 | 01:11:28 +01:10 |
| Wall Balls | 07:42 | 01:19:10 | 07:20 +00:22 | 01:18:03 +01:07 |
| Roxzone | 06:27 | 01:33:12 | 07:49 -01:22 | 01:33:12 |
Andrew Hay delivered a commendable performance in the 2024 Brisbane Hyrox event, ranking 384th overall and 7th in his age group (55-59). Notably, his total running time was 1:49 faster than the average, suggesting a strong running profile compared to his peers. Andrew started the race with impressive speed, particularly in the first running segment, but his pacing slightly declined in subsequent laps, indicating a need for improved endurance. Despite a strong start, his performance suggests a hybrid profile, with a need to focus on enhancing strength-based exercises to complement his running capabilities.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Schlösser Benedikt Pascal | 2024 Stuttgart | 01:33:02 | |
| Vandenlindenloof Erwin | 2022 Amsterdam | 01:33:09 | |
| Corbett John | 2024 Dublin | 01:32:49 | |
| Shield Noah | 2024 Melbourne | 01:32:57 | |
| Moores Jack | 2024 Birmingham | 01:33:42 | |
| Pope Brian | 2023 Los Angeles | 01:33:07 | |
| Mcghee Brandon | 2020 Chicago | 01:33:01 | |
| Jablonski Andre | 2019 Leipzig | 01:33:03 | |
| Juillet Jake | 2022 Los Angeles | 01:33:06 | |
| De Souza Evans | 2019 New York | 01:33:16 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
