Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Hallett Nathan's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Hallett Nathan's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Hallett Nathan's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Hallett Nathan's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:01. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 03:55 | 09:55 to 06:00 | 65.1% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:41 | 07:19 to 05:38 | 28.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:19 | 05:42 to 05:23 | 5.3% |
| Wall Balls | 00:06 | 07:18 to 07:12 | 1.7% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:17 to 04:17 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:31 to 02:31 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:40 to 04:40 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:16 to 02:16 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 42:01 to 42:01 | 0.0% |
| Hallett Nathan | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:40 | 00:00 | 04:58 +00:42 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:17 | 05:40 | 04:35 -00:18 | 04:58 +00:42 |
| Running 2 | 04:53 | 09:57 | 05:24 -00:31 | 09:33 +00:24 |
| Sled Push | 02:31 | 14:50 | 03:12 -00:41 | 14:57 -00:07 |
| Running 3 | 05:08 | 17:21 | 05:51 -00:43 | 18:09 -00:48 |
| Sled Pull | 05:42 | 22:29 | 05:31 +00:11 | 24:00 -01:31 |
| Running 4 | 05:19 | 28:11 | 05:52 -00:33 | 29:31 -01:20 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 09:55 | 33:30 | 06:15 +03:40 | 35:23 -01:53 |
| Running 5 | 05:14 | 43:25 | 06:06 -00:52 | 41:38 +01:47 |
| Rowing | 04:40 | 48:39 | 05:02 -00:22 | 47:44 +00:55 |
| Running 6 | 04:57 | 53:19 | 05:54 -00:57 | 52:46 +00:33 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:16 | 58:16 | 02:25 -00:09 | 58:40 -00:24 |
| Running 7 | 05:13 | 01:00:32 | 05:53 -00:40 | 01:01:05 -00:33 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 07:19 | 01:05:45 | 05:51 +01:28 | 01:06:58 -01:13 |
| Running 8 | 05:42 | 01:13:04 | 06:49 -01:07 | 01:12:49 +00:15 |
| Wall Balls | 07:18 | 01:18:46 | 07:31 -00:13 | 01:19:38 -00:52 |
| Roxzone | 09:20 | 01:35:14 | 08:05 +01:15 | 01:35:14 |
Nathan Hallett demonstrated a commendable performance in the 2024 Birmingham HYROX event, ranking in the top 48% of all the athletes and top 53% in his age group (35-39). His total running time was notably faster (by 05:01) than the average, indicating a strong running profile. However, his slower start in the first running segment (00:45 slower than average) suggests that he may benefit from a more aggressive start. His performance in the roxzone was slower than average, indicating that he took more time for transitions and rest.
Nathan should consider implementing the following strategies during the race for better performance:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Smith Davonte | 2021 Dallas | 01:35:11 | |
| Ewere Mudi | 2022 Birmingham | 01:35:21 | |
| Yew Isaac | 2023 Singapore | 01:35:24 | |
| Talaepa Michael | 2024 Melbourne | 01:34:59 | |
| Valle Carrera Giovanni | 2022 Madrid | 01:35:16 | |
| Vear Gary | 2023 Glasgow | 01:35:12 | |
| Holland Les | 2024 Brisbane | 01:35:40 | |
| Rodriguez Mike | 2023 Anaheim | 01:35:20 | |
| Lowe Shane | 2024 Sydney | 01:34:49 | |
| Paul Jonathan | 2024 Hong Kong | 01:34:55 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2022 Birmingham | 01:41:03 | |
| 2023 London | 01:34:05 | |
| 2023 London | 01:49:45 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
