Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Cunningham Gregory's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Cunningham Gregory's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Cunningham Gregory's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Cunningham Gregory's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 02:33. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 01:17 | 42:56 to 41:39 | 50.3% |
| Sled Push | 00:33 | 03:15 to 02:42 | 21.6% |
| Wall Balls | 00:20 | 06:23 to 06:03 | 13.1% |
| Rowing | 00:12 | 04:56 to 04:44 | 7.8% |
| Sled Pull | 00:09 | 04:47 to 04:38 | 5.9% |
| Ski Erg | 00:02 | 04:25 to 04:23 | 1.3% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:54 to 04:54 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:54 to 01:54 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:29 to 04:29 | 0.0% |
| Cunningham Gregory | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:18 | 00:00 | 04:36 +00:42 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:25 | 05:18 | 04:27 -00:02 | 04:36 +00:42 |
| Running 2 | 04:53 | 09:43 | 04:58 -00:05 | 09:03 +00:40 |
| Sled Push | 03:15 | 14:36 | 02:55 +00:20 | 14:01 +00:35 |
| Running 3 | 05:08 | 17:51 | 05:24 -00:16 | 16:56 +00:55 |
| Sled Pull | 04:47 | 22:59 | 04:58 -00:11 | 22:20 +00:39 |
| Running 4 | 05:12 | 27:46 | 05:23 -00:11 | 27:18 +00:28 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:54 | 32:58 | 05:20 -00:26 | 32:41 +00:17 |
| Running 5 | 05:26 | 37:52 | 05:33 -00:07 | 38:01 -00:09 |
| Rowing | 04:56 | 43:18 | 04:49 +00:07 | 43:34 -00:16 |
| Running 6 | 05:17 | 48:14 | 05:25 -00:08 | 48:23 -00:09 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:54 | 53:31 | 02:12 -00:18 | 53:48 -00:17 |
| Running 7 | 05:16 | 55:25 | 05:23 -00:07 | 56:00 -00:35 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:29 | 01:00:41 | 05:07 -00:38 | 01:01:23 -00:42 |
| Running 8 | 06:30 | 01:05:10 | 06:00 +00:30 | 01:06:30 -01:20 |
| Wall Balls | 06:23 | 01:11:40 | 06:32 -00:09 | 01:12:30 -00:50 |
| Roxzone | 08:01 | 01:25:55 | 06:53 +01:08 | 01:25:55 |
Gregory Cunningham's performance in the 2024 Birmingham HYROX race was impressive, especially considering his age group. He finished in the Top 34% of all athletes and an impressive Top 17% in his age category. His overall time was 01:25:55, with a total running time of 00:42:56, which was 00:04 faster than average. Gregory's running performance throughout the race was typically above average, indicating a strong running profile. This is further supported by his best running lap time of 00:04:53. However, his performance in the roxzone indicates room for improvement, as he was slower than average, suggesting that he may have taken more rest or had slower transition times.
Gregory should consider implementing the following strategies to improve his overall race performance:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Deubert Felix | 2018 Hamburg | 01:25:40 | |
| Mackintosh Alasdair | 2023 Glasgow | 01:25:48 | |
| Reyes Antonio | 2023 Los Angeles | 01:26:18 | |
| Filipskyy Andriy | 2024 Rimini | 01:26:19 | |
| Colless Ben | 2023 Sydney | 01:26:02 | |
| Fuenmayor Jorman | 2023 London | 01:25:47 | |
| Van Steeg Bart | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:25:25 | |
| Fidler Bruce | 2022 London | 01:26:20 | |
| Ivarson Nick | 2024 Chicago Navy Pier | 01:25:39 | |
| Mixter Stephan | 2024 Gdansk | 01:26:23 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Dublin | 01:22:24 | |
| 2024 Glasgow | 01:29:24 | |
| 2024 London | 01:26:11 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
