Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Conway Ibar's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Conway Ibar's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Conway Ibar's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Conway Ibar's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:45. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:36 | 06:16 to 04:40 | 33.7% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:32 | 06:20 to 04:48 | 32.3% |
| Wall Balls | 01:03 | 06:53 to 05:50 | 22.1% |
| Run Total | 00:23 | 41:12 to 40:49 | 8.1% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:09 | 02:08 to 01:59 | 3.2% |
| Rowing | 00:02 | 04:43 to 04:41 | 0.7% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:16 to 04:16 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:27 to 02:27 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:04 to 04:04 | 0.0% |
| Conway Ibar | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:24 | 00:00 | 04:33 -01:09 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:16 | 03:24 | 04:24 -00:08 | 04:33 -01:09 |
| Running 2 | 04:55 | 07:40 | 04:52 +00:03 | 08:57 -01:17 |
| Sled Push | 02:27 | 12:35 | 02:52 -00:25 | 13:49 -01:14 |
| Running 3 | 05:13 | 15:02 | 05:18 -00:05 | 16:41 -01:39 |
| Sled Pull | 04:04 | 20:15 | 04:49 -00:45 | 21:59 -01:44 |
| Running 4 | 05:19 | 24:19 | 05:15 +00:04 | 26:48 -02:29 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:20 | 29:38 | 05:07 +01:13 | 32:03 -02:25 |
| Running 5 | 05:28 | 35:58 | 05:26 +00:02 | 37:10 -01:12 |
| Rowing | 04:43 | 41:26 | 04:46 -00:03 | 42:36 -01:10 |
| Running 6 | 05:21 | 46:09 | 05:18 +00:03 | 47:22 -01:13 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:08 | 51:30 | 02:08 +00:00 | 52:40 -01:10 |
| Running 7 | 05:19 | 53:38 | 05:17 +00:02 | 54:48 -01:10 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:16 | 58:57 | 04:57 +01:19 | 01:00:05 -01:08 |
| Running 8 | 06:17 | 01:05:13 | 05:51 +00:26 | 01:05:02 +00:11 |
| Wall Balls | 06:53 | 01:11:30 | 06:16 +00:37 | 01:10:53 +00:37 |
| Roxzone | 05:32 | 01:23:46 | 06:37 -01:05 | 01:23:46 |
Ibar Conway delivered a commendable performance at the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox race, achieving an overall rank of 962, placing him in the top 30% of all athletes, and an impressive rank of 47 in his age group, putting him in the top 19% of his peers. His overall time was 01:23:46, with a total running time of 00:41:12, which was 1:00 faster than the average, indicating a strong running capability. His best running lap was an impressive 00:04:55. The initial running segments, particularly Running 1, suggest that Ibar started with a strong pace, possibly too fast, leading to a decline in pace in later running segments.
Overall, Ibar demonstrates a better running profile, excelling in speed but with room for improvement in strength-based exercises, as indicated by his slower times in segments like Burpees Broad Jump, Sandbag Lunges, and Wall Balls.
It's essential to simulate compromised running scenarios where running follows these strength exercises to train for fatigue management.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Ubertiello Andrea | 2023 Milan | 01:23:32 | |
| Muir Jamie | 2024 London | 01:24:11 | |
| Brereton Ben | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:23:44 | |
| Conboy Seamus | 2023 Dublin | 01:24:01 | |
| Zanella Tobias | 2023 Frankfurt | 01:23:18 | |
| Crompton Matthew | 2024 Melbourne | 01:24:03 | |
| Jäschke Martin | 2021 Berlin | 01:24:14 | |
| Sutton Ed | 2024 Manchester | 01:23:47 | |
| Figueroa Benavides Joan | 2024 Madrid | 01:24:08 | |
| Grellier Paul | 2024 Marseille | 01:23:43 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Gdansk | 01:23:09 | |
| 2024 Marseille | 01:11:59 | |
| 2024 Berlin | 01:17:47 | |
| 2024 Paris | 01:19:52 | |
| 2024 Glasgow | 01:36:32 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
