Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Milan using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Singhammer David's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Singhammer David's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Singhammer David's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Singhammer David's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:11. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 05:31 | 10:48 to 05:17 | 89.2% |
| Sled Pull | 00:24 | 04:30 to 04:06 | 6.5% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:16 | 04:33 to 04:17 | 4.3% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:07 to 04:07 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:15 to 02:15 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:13 to 04:13 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:42 to 01:42 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:12 to 04:12 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 36:24 to 36:24 | 0.0% |
| Singhammer David | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:24 | 00:00 | 04:20 +00:04 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:07 | 04:24 | 04:20 -00:13 | 04:20 +00:04 |
| Running 2 | 04:00 | 08:31 | 04:39 -00:39 | 08:40 -00:09 |
| Sled Push | 02:15 | 12:31 | 02:41 -00:26 | 13:19 -00:48 |
| Running 3 | 04:50 | 14:46 | 05:02 -00:12 | 16:00 -01:14 |
| Sled Pull | 04:30 | 19:36 | 04:27 +00:03 | 21:02 -01:26 |
| Running 4 | 04:42 | 24:06 | 05:00 -00:18 | 25:29 -01:23 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:33 | 28:48 | 04:43 -00:10 | 30:29 -01:41 |
| Running 5 | 04:58 | 33:21 | 05:10 -00:12 | 35:12 -01:51 |
| Rowing | 04:13 | 38:19 | 04:40 -00:27 | 40:22 -02:03 |
| Running 6 | 04:54 | 42:32 | 05:03 -00:09 | 45:02 -02:30 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:42 | 47:26 | 02:01 -00:19 | 50:05 -02:39 |
| Running 7 | 04:37 | 49:08 | 05:01 -00:24 | 52:06 -02:58 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:12 | 53:45 | 04:36 -00:24 | 57:07 -03:22 |
| Running 8 | 04:02 | 57:57 | 05:29 -01:27 | 01:01:43 -03:46 |
| Wall Balls | 10:48 | 01:01:59 | 05:47 +05:01 | 01:07:12 -05:13 |
| Roxzone | 06:17 | 01:18:57 | 05:58 +00:19 | 01:18:57 |
David Singhammer showcased a commendable performance at the 2024 Milan Hyrox event, securing an overall rank of 298, placing him in the top 21% of participants. His strong running capabilities were evident, with a total running time of 00:36:24, which was 3 minutes and 44 seconds faster than the average, indicating a strong runner profile. His pacing strategy appeared well-calibrated, with a particularly impressive performance in Running 2 and Running 8, suggesting he maintained energy efficiently for later stages of the race. However, his performance in the Wall Balls segment indicates an area of significant improvement, which, along with some transitions, affected his overall time.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Reinelt Tobias | 2019 Hannover | 01:18:59 | |
| Albert Remi | 2024 Paris | 01:18:49 | |
| Poltoraczyk Marius | 2022 Hamburg | 01:19:23 | |
| Takken Robbin | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:18:51 | |
| Buckley Andrew | 2024 London | 01:18:52 | |
| Bailey Christopher | 2023 Birmingham | 01:18:53 | |
| Fingerle Justin | 2023 Stuttgart | 01:18:51 | |
| Höher Julian | 2024 Hamburg | 01:18:43 | |
| Allin Sean | 2022 Dallas | 01:18:37 | |
| Issa Jaafar | 2022 London | 01:18:41 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
