Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Manchester using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Mcconnell Craig's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Mcconnell Craig's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Mcconnell Craig's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Mcconnell Craig's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:53. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 03:10 | 41:17 to 38:07 | 64.8% |
| Wall Balls | 00:32 | 05:44 to 05:12 | 10.9% |
| Sled Push | 00:24 | 02:44 to 02:20 | 8.2% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:15 | 04:27 to 04:12 | 5.1% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:13 | 04:25 to 04:12 | 4.4% |
| Rowing | 00:11 | 04:43 to 04:32 | 3.8% |
| Ski Erg | 00:07 | 04:20 to 04:13 | 2.4% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:01 | 01:49 to 01:48 | 0.3% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 03:54 to 03:54 | 0.0% |
| Mcconnell Craig | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:44 | 00:00 | 04:18 -00:34 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:20 | 03:44 | 04:19 +00:01 | 04:18 -00:34 |
| Running 2 | 04:53 | 08:04 | 04:36 +00:17 | 08:37 -00:33 |
| Sled Push | 02:44 | 12:57 | 02:38 +00:06 | 13:13 -00:16 |
| Running 3 | 05:00 | 15:41 | 04:59 +00:01 | 15:51 -00:10 |
| Sled Pull | 03:54 | 20:41 | 04:24 -00:30 | 20:50 -00:09 |
| Running 4 | 05:09 | 24:35 | 04:58 +00:11 | 25:14 -00:39 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:25 | 29:44 | 04:36 -00:11 | 30:12 -00:28 |
| Running 5 | 05:28 | 34:09 | 05:06 +00:22 | 34:48 -00:39 |
| Rowing | 04:43 | 39:37 | 04:38 +00:05 | 39:54 -00:17 |
| Running 6 | 05:19 | 44:20 | 04:59 +00:20 | 44:32 -00:12 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:49 | 49:39 | 01:59 -00:10 | 49:31 +00:08 |
| Running 7 | 05:42 | 51:28 | 04:58 +00:44 | 51:30 -00:02 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:27 | 57:10 | 04:32 -00:05 | 56:28 +00:42 |
| Running 8 | 06:05 | 01:01:37 | 05:25 +00:40 | 01:01:00 +00:37 |
| Wall Balls | 05:44 | 01:07:42 | 05:42 +00:02 | 01:06:25 +01:17 |
| Roxzone | 04:42 | 01:18:01 | 05:54 -01:12 | 01:18:01 |
Craig Mcconnell's performance in the 2024 Manchester HYROX race showcased a commendable effort, with an overall ranking in the top 40% of 1203 athletes. His total running time was slower than the average by 01:47, suggesting a more strength-oriented profile. While his initial pace (Running 1) was faster than average, subsequent running segments showed a slowdown, indicating a need for pacing improvement. Despite slower running times, Craig excelled in the strength segments like Sled Pull and Farmers Carry where he clocked faster than average times. A notable achievement was his Roxzone time, where he was faster than average by 01:04, showcasing his efficient transitions and resting strategy.
Craig should consider implementing the following strategies to improve his race performance:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dobbertin Niclas | 2024 Berlin | 01:18:19 | |
| Prejna Peter | 2024 Glasgow | 01:18:10 | |
| Di Lenarda Lino | 2023 Frankfurt | 01:18:31 | |
| Turnet Lewis | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:17:54 | |
| Scheffler Peter | 2024 Hamburg | 01:18:16 | |
| Rizzelli Maxime | 2024 Paris | 01:18:30 | |
| Skinner Patrick | 2023 London | 01:17:56 | |
| Kropf Reagan | 2023 Dallas | 01:17:41 | |
| Whitworth Tom | 2021 London | 01:18:05 | |
| Mullins Stuart | 2023 Birmingham | 01:18:23 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Barcelona | 01:33:49 | |
| 2024 Glasgow | 01:24:51 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
