Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Brisbane using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 853 similar athletes.
We stack your running times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you measure up. This chart breaks it down, showing whether you were blazing fast, cruising steady, or losing pace.
It’s all about finding out if your running strategy matched your overall finish time!
We pit your station times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you stack up. This chart shows if you crushed it, coasted, or found that sweet spot for your overall finish time.
Here’s the full breakdown of the race, station by station and run by run, stacked against the average of athletes with similar finish times.
In HYROX, pacing is the name of the game. The pacing line shows where you hit the gas, tapped the brakes, or nailed it perfectly—guiding the way to a more balanced and dominant race strategy.
With the RoxCoach Simulation machine, you can see how your predicted finish time evolves as you power through your race. This next-level tech recalculates your estimated finish time after every run and every station. Crushing the sled pull? Gaining ground on the row? Or holding strong in the Wall Balls? RoxCoach tracks it all, giving you the inside scoop on where you shined and where there’s room to level up.
This chart breaks down the splits for every athlete in the division, giving you a clear look at how times are distributed across the pack.
Compare performance to the competition, spotting where they dominated and where there’s room to improve.
You’ll see how they stack up against the Top 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and beyond. Outliers are out—so the focus stays on the real competition.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve his time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 08:09. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:23 (From 12:00 to 06:37) | 66.1% |
| BBJ | 01:28 (From 08:39 to 07:11) | 18.0% |
| Wall Balls | 01:10 (From 09:51 to 08:41) | 14.3% |
| Ski Erg | 00:08 (From 04:56 to 04:48) | 1.6% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 (From 02:27 to 02:27) | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 (From 05:17 to 05:17) | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 (From 04:58 to 04:58) | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 (From 02:42 to 02:42) | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 (From 49:23 to 49:23) | 0.0% |
| Grant Gavin | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 06:38 | 00:00 | 05:22 +01:16 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:56 | 06:38 | 04:46 +00:10 | 05:22 +01:16 |
| Running 2 | 05:34 | 11:34 | 05:54 -00:20 | 10:08 +01:26 |
| Sled Push | 02:27 | 17:08 | 03:41 -01:14 | 16:02 +01:06 |
| Running 3 | 05:52 | 19:35 | 06:33 -00:41 | 19:43 -00:08 |
| Sled Pull | 05:17 | 25:27 | 06:25 -01:08 | 26:16 -00:49 |
| Running 4 | 06:02 | 30:44 | 06:32 -00:30 | 32:41 -01:57 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 08:39 | 36:46 | 07:24 +01:15 | 39:13 -02:27 |
| Running 5 | 06:11 | 45:25 | 06:49 -00:38 | 46:37 -01:12 |
| Rowing | 04:58 | 51:36 | 05:17 -00:19 | 53:26 -01:50 |
| Running 6 | 06:07 | 56:34 | 06:37 -00:30 | 58:43 -02:09 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:42 | 01:02:41 | 02:41 +00:01 | 01:05:20 -02:39 |
| Running 7 | 06:10 | 01:05:23 | 06:37 -00:27 | 01:08:01 -02:38 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 12:00 | 01:11:33 | 06:53 +05:07 | 01:14:38 -03:05 |
| Running 8 | 06:51 | 01:23:33 | 08:08 -01:17 | 01:21:31 +02:02 |
| Wall Balls | 09:51 | 01:30:24 | 08:51 +01:00 | 01:29:39 +00:45 |
| Roxzone | 08:10 | 01:48:19 | 09:49 -01:39 | 01:48:19 |
Gavin Grant performed commendably in the 2024 Brisbane HYROX race, achieving an overall rank of 524 out of 1014 athletes, placing him in the top 51%. In his age group (55-59), he ranked 12th, positioning him in the top 57% of 21 athletes. His overall time was 01:48:19, with a notable strength in running, as evidenced by his total running time of 49:23, which was 3:30 faster than the average. This suggests a strong running profile, as he consistently outpaced competitors in the running segments. His initial running split was slower than average, indicating a conservative start, but he maintained a strong pace throughout the subsequent running segments. While his running ability is a clear strength, there is a need to balance it with improved strength and technical exercises, particularly in segments like Sandbag Lunges and Wall Balls.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| De Vreng Robbert | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:47:56 | |
| Andresen David | 2022 Chicago | 01:48:12 | |
| Tavenier Peter | 2024 Maastricht | 01:48:14 | |
| Moss Roman | 2024 Madrid | 01:48:48 | |
| Jülicher Nicolas | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:47:51 | |
| Wright Adrian | 2024 Birmingham | 01:48:28 | |
| Anselmo Luca | 2024 Rimini | 01:48:12 | |
| Kolfenbach William | 2023 New York | 01:48:36 | |
| Himaj Luzim | 2023 Hamburg | 01:48:17 | |
| Stapelkamp Matthijs | 2022 Maastricht | 01:48:13 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Melbourne Grant Gavin, Maloney Kane | 01:20:09 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
Grant Gavin
