Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Stuttgart using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Frost Dan's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Frost Dan's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Frost Dan's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Frost Dan's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:09. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 03:58 | 47:09 to 43:11 | 64.5% |
| Sled Pull | 01:08 | 06:02 to 04:54 | 18.4% |
| Wall Balls | 01:03 | 07:31 to 06:28 | 17.1% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:23 to 04:23 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:03 to 02:03 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 05:12 to 05:12 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:45 to 04:45 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:08 to 02:08 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 03:54 to 03:54 | 0.0% |
| Frost Dan | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:05 | 00:00 | 04:45 +00:20 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:23 | 05:05 | 04:30 -00:07 | 04:45 +00:20 |
| Running 2 | 06:17 | 09:28 | 05:07 +01:10 | 09:15 +00:13 |
| Sled Push | 02:03 | 15:45 | 03:01 -00:58 | 14:22 +01:23 |
| Running 3 | 10:00 | 17:48 | 05:34 +04:26 | 17:23 +00:25 |
| Sled Pull | 06:02 | 27:48 | 05:10 +00:52 | 22:57 +04:51 |
| Running 4 | 05:00 | 33:50 | 05:34 -00:34 | 28:07 +05:43 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:12 | 38:50 | 05:41 -00:29 | 33:41 +05:09 |
| Running 5 | 05:09 | 44:02 | 05:45 -00:36 | 39:22 +04:40 |
| Rowing | 04:45 | 49:11 | 04:53 -00:08 | 45:07 +04:04 |
| Running 6 | 05:03 | 53:56 | 05:36 -00:33 | 50:00 +03:56 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:08 | 58:59 | 02:16 -00:08 | 55:36 +03:23 |
| Running 7 | 05:04 | 01:01:07 | 05:34 -00:30 | 57:52 +03:15 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:54 | 01:06:11 | 05:24 -01:30 | 01:03:26 +02:45 |
| Running 8 | 05:35 | 01:10:05 | 06:15 -00:40 | 01:08:50 +01:15 |
| Wall Balls | 07:31 | 01:15:40 | 06:52 +00:39 | 01:15:05 +00:35 |
| Roxzone | 06:06 | 01:29:11 | 07:14 -01:08 | 01:29:11 |
Dan Frost showed a commendable performance in the HYROX race, finishing in the top 38% of his category. His overall time was 01:29:11, which indicates a well-rounded effort. However, his total running time was 00:47:09, which is 02:35 slower than the average. This suggests that Dan may have a stronger inclination towards strength exercises, as evidenced by his excellent performance in the Sled Push and Sandbag Lunges. Despite starting the race with a slower pace in the early running segments, he demonstrated improvement in running speed in later segments. This indicates a strategic pacing approach, allowing for a stronger finish.
By addressing the identified areas of improvement and implementing the suggested strategies, Dan Frost can enhance his performance in future HYROX races, achieving faster overall times and improved rankings.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Ende Ben | 2024 New York | 01:29:28 | |
| Tennant Adam | 2023 London | 01:29:06 | |
| Cola Simone | 2024 Milan | 01:29:11 | |
| Di Mauro Salvatore | 2024 Turin | 01:28:51 | |
| Lam Alex | 2023 Hong Kong | 01:29:02 | |
| Becker Stefan | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:28:44 | |
| Ferreira Micael | 2024 Malaga | 01:29:27 | |
| Minnaert Mario | 2023 Chicago | 01:29:31 | |
| Rühl Stefan | 2022 Frankfurt | 01:29:26 | |
| Koops HP | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:29:26 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
