Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Milan using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 433 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Deegan Emma's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Deegan Emma's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Deegan Emma's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Deegan Emma's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:10. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 02:03 | 05:08 to 03:05 | 49.2% |
| Sled Push | 00:47 | 02:39 to 01:52 | 18.8% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:41 | 04:40 to 03:59 | 16.4% |
| Sled Pull | 00:17 | 04:18 to 04:01 | 6.8% |
| Ski Erg | 00:15 | 04:50 to 04:35 | 6.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:04 | 01:46 to 01:42 | 1.6% |
| Rowing | 00:03 | 04:51 to 04:48 | 1.2% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 02:59 to 02:59 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 35:25 to 35:25 | 0.0% |
| Deegan Emma | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:12 | 00:00 | 04:16 +00:56 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:50 | 05:12 | 04:44 +00:06 | 04:16 +00:56 |
| Running 2 | 04:12 | 10:02 | 04:34 -00:22 | 09:00 +01:02 |
| Sled Push | 02:39 | 14:14 | 02:17 +00:22 | 13:34 +00:40 |
| Running 3 | 04:19 | 16:53 | 04:47 -00:28 | 15:51 +01:02 |
| Sled Pull | 04:18 | 21:12 | 04:30 -00:12 | 20:38 +00:34 |
| Running 4 | 04:20 | 25:30 | 04:47 -00:27 | 25:08 +00:22 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:40 | 29:50 | 04:24 +00:16 | 29:55 -00:05 |
| Running 5 | 04:39 | 34:30 | 04:54 -00:15 | 34:19 +00:11 |
| Rowing | 04:51 | 39:09 | 04:56 -00:05 | 39:13 -00:04 |
| Running 6 | 04:38 | 44:00 | 04:50 -00:12 | 44:09 -00:09 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:46 | 48:38 | 01:52 -00:06 | 48:59 -00:21 |
| Running 7 | 04:25 | 50:24 | 04:50 -00:25 | 50:51 -00:27 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 02:59 | 54:49 | 03:40 -00:41 | 55:41 -00:52 |
| Running 8 | 03:43 | 57:48 | 05:02 -01:19 | 59:21 -01:33 |
| Wall Balls | 05:08 | 01:01:31 | 03:38 +01:30 | 01:04:23 -02:52 |
| Roxzone | 06:24 | 01:12:55 | 04:54 +01:30 | 01:12:55 |
Emma Deegan delivered an impressive performance in the 2024 Milan Hyrox race, ranking 24th overall and 8th in her age group, placing her in the top 1% of competitors. Her overall time was 01:12:55, which is commendable. Emma demonstrated a strong running capability, with a total running time of 00:35:25, which was 02:48 faster than the average, indicating a runner's profile. Her pacing strategy was effective, as she progressively improved her running splits, particularly excelling in the last segment. However, her performance in the Roxzone and certain strength exercises suggests that there is room for improvement in transitions and strength-based tasks.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Salcedo González Oihane | 2023 Bilbao | 01:12:36 | |
| Zander Marina | 2019 Essen | 01:13:02 | |
| Henderson Kara | 2024 Melbourne | 01:13:16 | |
| Devine Kelsey | 2023 Glasgow | 01:13:22 | |
| Hammond Krista | 2022 Frankfurt | 01:13:24 | |
| Barba Claudia | 2022 Manchester | 01:13:02 | |
| Casey Ruth | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:12:25 | |
| Klein Séréna | 2024 Berlin | 01:12:57 | |
| Oliver Aimee | 2024 Birmingham | 01:13:14 | |
| Lopes Pamella | 2024 Rimini | 01:13:00 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 London | 01:07:48 | |
| 2023 London | 01:10:03 | |
| 2023 Manchester | 01:25:16 | |
| 2022 London | 01:19:40 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
