Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Begley Kevin's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Begley Kevin's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Begley Kevin's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Begley Kevin's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:05. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 02:17 | 08:10 to 05:53 | 44.9% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:03 | 05:45 to 04:42 | 20.7% |
| Sled Pull | 00:33 | 05:04 to 04:31 | 10.8% |
| Rowing | 00:22 | 05:04 to 04:42 | 7.2% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:21 | 02:21 to 02:00 | 6.9% |
| Ski Erg | 00:19 | 04:40 to 04:21 | 6.2% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:10 | 05:00 to 04:50 | 3.3% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:35 to 02:35 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 38:24 to 38:24 | 0.0% |
| Begley Kevin | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:24 | 00:00 | 04:33 +00:51 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:40 | 05:24 | 04:24 +00:16 | 04:33 +00:51 |
| Running 2 | 04:32 | 10:04 | 04:53 -00:21 | 08:57 +01:07 |
| Sled Push | 02:35 | 14:36 | 02:52 -00:17 | 13:50 +00:46 |
| Running 3 | 04:41 | 17:11 | 05:18 -00:37 | 16:42 +00:29 |
| Sled Pull | 05:04 | 21:52 | 04:49 +00:15 | 22:00 -00:08 |
| Running 4 | 04:46 | 26:56 | 05:16 -00:30 | 26:49 +00:07 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:00 | 31:42 | 05:07 -00:07 | 32:05 -00:23 |
| Running 5 | 04:54 | 36:42 | 05:26 -00:32 | 37:12 -00:30 |
| Rowing | 05:04 | 41:36 | 04:46 +00:18 | 42:38 -01:02 |
| Running 6 | 04:33 | 46:40 | 05:18 -00:45 | 47:24 -00:44 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:21 | 51:13 | 02:08 +00:13 | 52:42 -01:29 |
| Running 7 | 04:45 | 53:34 | 05:17 -00:32 | 54:50 -01:16 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:45 | 58:19 | 04:57 +00:48 | 01:00:07 -01:48 |
| Running 8 | 04:51 | 01:04:04 | 05:51 -01:00 | 01:05:04 -01:00 |
| Wall Balls | 08:10 | 01:08:55 | 06:16 +01:54 | 01:10:55 -02:00 |
| Roxzone | 06:53 | 01:23:50 | 06:39 +00:14 | 01:23:50 |
Kevin Begley demonstrated a commendable performance in the 2024 Birmingham Hyrox race. His overall time was 01:23:50, which placed him in the top 30% of 4107 athletes. More specifically, he was ranked 205th in his age group (40-44), placing him in the top 28% of his peers.
Kevin's total running time was 00:38:24, making him 03:41 faster than the average competitor. This suggests that Kevin has a strong runner's profile and excels in the running segments of the competition. His best running lap was completed in 00:04:32, further highlighting his speed and endurance.
However, Kevin's Roxzone time was 00:06:53, which is 00:23 slower than average. This indicates that he rested more or took more time to transition between exercises. In terms of pacing, Kevin seemed to start slower (Running 1 was 00:51 slower than average) but managed to pick up speed in the following segments.
Despite his overall strong performance, there are a few segments where Kevin could focus on improvement:
In future races, there are several strategies Kevin could implement for better performance:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Hillman Matt | 2024 New York | 01:24:08 | |
| Longton Mauricio | 2024 Fort Lauderdale | 01:24:08 | |
| Waters Alfie | 2024 Dubai | 01:23:38 | |
| Losiniecki Matt | 2022 Dallas | 01:23:24 | |
| Lenormand David | 2024 Melbourne | 01:23:44 | |
| Connor Ed | 2019 New York | 01:23:58 | |
| Novi Lucas | 2024 Stockholm | 01:23:32 | |
| Gilmour Daniel | 2024 Glasgow | 01:24:17 | |
| Ross Tim | 2022 Hamburg | 01:23:23 | |
| Alcobia José | 2024 Madrid | 01:24:02 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Glasgow | 01:28:39 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
