Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Milan using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Arduin Matteo's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Arduin Matteo's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Arduin Matteo's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Arduin Matteo's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:35. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 01:28 | 09:13 to 07:45 | 40.9% |
| Sled Pull | 00:55 | 06:39 to 05:44 | 25.6% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:37 | 03:06 to 02:29 | 17.2% |
| Rowing | 00:19 | 05:24 to 05:05 | 8.8% |
| Ski Erg | 00:15 | 04:55 to 04:40 | 7.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:01 | 06:01 to 06:00 | 0.5% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 03:17 to 03:17 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 05:52 to 05:52 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 46:02 to 46:02 | 0.0% |
| Arduin Matteo | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 06:41 | 00:00 | 05:03 +01:38 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:55 | 06:41 | 04:39 +00:16 | 05:03 +01:38 |
| Running 2 | 05:26 | 11:36 | 05:35 -00:09 | 09:42 +01:54 |
| Sled Push | 03:17 | 17:02 | 03:26 -00:09 | 15:17 +01:45 |
| Running 3 | 05:35 | 20:19 | 06:07 -00:32 | 18:43 +01:36 |
| Sled Pull | 06:39 | 25:54 | 05:51 +00:48 | 24:50 +01:04 |
| Running 4 | 05:45 | 32:33 | 06:05 -00:20 | 30:41 +01:52 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:52 | 38:18 | 06:36 -00:44 | 36:46 +01:32 |
| Running 5 | 05:59 | 44:10 | 06:21 -00:22 | 43:22 +00:48 |
| Rowing | 05:24 | 50:09 | 05:07 +00:17 | 49:43 +00:26 |
| Running 6 | 05:46 | 55:33 | 06:08 -00:22 | 54:50 +00:43 |
| Farmers Carry | 03:06 | 01:01:19 | 02:31 +00:35 | 01:00:58 +00:21 |
| Running 7 | 05:50 | 01:04:25 | 06:08 -00:18 | 01:03:29 +00:56 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:01 | 01:10:15 | 06:12 -00:11 | 01:09:37 +00:38 |
| Running 8 | 05:03 | 01:16:16 | 07:08 -02:05 | 01:15:49 +00:27 |
| Wall Balls | 09:13 | 01:21:19 | 07:59 +01:14 | 01:22:57 -01:38 |
| Roxzone | 09:08 | 01:39:33 | 08:37 +00:31 | 01:39:33 |
Matteo Arduin's performance in the 2024 Milan Hyrox race indicates he has a strong running profile, finishing with a total running time of 00:46:02, which is 02:53 faster than the average. This suggests a natural aptitude for running, which could be leveraged further. However, the analysis of his pacing reveals that he started slower than average, as seen in Running 1, but improved significantly in the later segments, particularly Running 8 where he was 02:11 faster than average. This indicates a need to work on starting strong while maintaining his pace throughout the race. In terms of strength, his performance suggests room for improvement, particularly in exercises like Wall Balls and Sled Pull.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Levy Benjamin | 2022 New York | 01:39:48 | |
| Ambrahsat Dennis | 2021 Hamburg | 01:39:15 | |
| Mastracchio Jacopo | 2024 Paris | 01:39:17 | |
| Czora Bartosz | 2019 Hamburg | 01:39:29 | |
| Soon Edward | 2024 Singapore National Stadium | 01:39:52 | |
| Noakes Nathan | 2022 Birmingham | 01:39:49 | |
| Billinson Eric | 2024 Fort Lauderdale | 01:39:16 | |
| Leva Stefano | 2024 Rimini | 01:39:19 | |
| Reeves Anthony | 2024 Manchester | 01:39:03 | |
| Taylor James | 2023 London | 01:39:32 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
