Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Melbourne using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Wells Patrick's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Wells Patrick's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Wells Patrick's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Wells Patrick's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:03. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:11 | 36:42 to 34:31 | 53.9% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:58 | 04:24 to 03:26 | 23.9% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:29 | 04:06 to 03:37 | 11.9% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:15 | 01:50 to 01:35 | 6.2% |
| Ski Erg | 00:04 | 04:06 to 04:02 | 1.6% |
| Wall Balls | 00:04 | 04:31 to 04:27 | 1.6% |
| Rowing | 00:02 | 04:22 to 04:20 | 0.8% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 01:53 to 01:53 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 03:20 to 03:20 | 0.0% |
| Wells Patrick | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:34 | 00:00 | 03:58 +00:36 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:06 | 04:34 | 04:11 -00:05 | 03:58 +00:36 |
| Running 2 | 04:25 | 08:40 | 04:14 +00:11 | 08:09 +00:31 |
| Sled Push | 01:53 | 13:05 | 02:26 -00:33 | 12:23 +00:42 |
| Running 3 | 04:31 | 14:58 | 04:32 -00:01 | 14:49 +00:09 |
| Sled Pull | 03:20 | 19:29 | 03:58 -00:38 | 19:21 +00:08 |
| Running 4 | 04:34 | 22:49 | 04:31 +00:03 | 23:19 -00:30 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:24 | 27:23 | 04:01 +00:23 | 27:50 -00:27 |
| Running 5 | 04:45 | 31:47 | 04:38 +00:07 | 31:51 -00:04 |
| Rowing | 04:22 | 36:32 | 04:28 -00:06 | 36:29 +00:03 |
| Running 6 | 04:26 | 40:54 | 04:33 -00:07 | 40:57 -00:03 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:50 | 45:20 | 01:49 +00:01 | 45:30 -00:10 |
| Running 7 | 04:24 | 47:10 | 04:32 -00:08 | 47:19 -00:09 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:06 | 51:34 | 04:01 +00:05 | 51:51 -00:17 |
| Running 8 | 05:07 | 55:40 | 04:51 +00:16 | 55:52 -00:12 |
| Wall Balls | 04:31 | 01:00:47 | 05:01 -00:30 | 01:00:43 +00:04 |
| Roxzone | 05:35 | 01:10:45 | 05:01 +00:34 | 01:10:45 |
Patrick Wells delivered an impressive performance in the 2024 Melbourne HYROX race, securing the 88th overall rank, placing him in the top 4% of all athletes, and 2nd in his age group, making him top 1% among his peers. This demonstrates his competitive edge and strength, particularly in his age category. Patrick's overall time was 01:10:45, showcasing his ability in both running and strength-based events. However, his total running time was 00:36:42, which was 32 seconds slower than average, indicating potential room for improvement in his running performance. His running times suggest a steady pace, with no drastic variations in the first four running segments, indicating he didn't start too fast or too slow. Overall, Patrick exhibits a balanced profile with strength-oriented exercises as a strong suit, given his faster-than-average splits in the Ski Erg, Sled Push, Sled Pull, Rowing, and Wall Balls.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Sztuka Markus | 2024 Stuttgart | 01:10:53 | |
| Morris Tom | 2021 Birmingham | 01:11:13 | |
| Colquitt Scott | 2024 Paris | 01:10:59 | |
| Jay Doesitall | 2024 Paris | 01:10:41 | |
| Soonieus Mike | 2024 Maastricht | 01:10:49 | |
| Rai Arun | 2023 Chicago | 01:10:58 | |
| Maguire Callum | 2024 Manchester | 01:11:10 | |
| Lammel Jonathan | 2020 Karlsruhe | 01:10:24 | |
| Rühl Fabian | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:10:52 | |
| Pogea Eduard | 2024 Berlin | 01:10:44 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
