Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Verzellenberg Pepijn's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Verzellenberg Pepijn's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Verzellenberg Pepijn's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Verzellenberg Pepijn's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:33. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 03:11 | 09:47 to 06:36 | 57.4% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:38 | 07:07 to 05:29 | 29.4% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:27 | 05:40 to 05:13 | 8.1% |
| Run Total | 00:08 | 43:51 to 43:43 | 2.4% |
| Rowing | 00:07 | 04:58 to 04:51 | 2.1% |
| Ski Erg | 00:02 | 04:31 to 04:29 | 0.6% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:38 to 02:38 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:24 to 04:24 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:41 to 01:41 | 0.0% |
| Verzellenberg Pepijn | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:14 | 00:00 | 04:45 -01:31 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:31 | 03:14 | 04:31 +00:00 | 04:45 -01:31 |
| Running 2 | 04:56 | 07:45 | 05:08 -00:12 | 09:16 -01:31 |
| Sled Push | 02:38 | 12:41 | 03:05 -00:27 | 14:24 -01:43 |
| Running 3 | 05:32 | 15:19 | 05:38 -00:06 | 17:29 -02:10 |
| Sled Pull | 04:24 | 20:51 | 05:15 -00:51 | 23:07 -02:16 |
| Running 4 | 05:33 | 25:15 | 05:36 -00:03 | 28:22 -03:07 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:07 | 30:48 | 05:45 +01:22 | 33:58 -03:10 |
| Running 5 | 06:01 | 37:55 | 05:47 +00:14 | 39:43 -01:48 |
| Rowing | 04:58 | 43:56 | 04:55 +00:03 | 45:30 -01:34 |
| Running 6 | 05:56 | 48:54 | 05:38 +00:18 | 50:25 -01:31 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:41 | 54:50 | 02:17 -00:36 | 56:03 -01:13 |
| Running 7 | 05:57 | 56:31 | 05:37 +00:20 | 58:20 -01:49 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:40 | 01:02:28 | 05:29 +00:11 | 01:03:57 -01:29 |
| Running 8 | 06:45 | 01:08:08 | 06:19 +00:26 | 01:09:26 -01:18 |
| Wall Balls | 09:47 | 01:14:53 | 06:58 +02:49 | 01:15:45 -00:52 |
| Roxzone | 05:38 | 01:30:10 | 07:27 -01:49 | 01:30:10 |
Pepijn Verzellenberg delivered a commendable performance in the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox race, placing in the top 42% overall and the top 41% within his age group. His overall completion time of 01:30:10 is competitive, with a notably strong total running time of 00:43:51, which was 01:01 faster than the average. This indicates a strong running profile. However, his pacing strategy could be refined, as he started quite fast in the initial running segments, significantly outperforming the average in Running 1 but gradually slowing down in later segments. This suggests a need for improved pacing to maintain consistency throughout the race.
By focusing on these areas of improvement and implementing the recommended strategies, Pepijn can enhance his performance in future Hyrox events, potentially achieving higher rankings and personal bests.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Böck Nico | 2019 Karlsruhe | 01:30:15 | |
| Van Vliet Henk | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:29:51 | |
| Garcia Diego | 2023 Sydney | 01:30:24 | |
| Vahlquist Erik | 2024 Copenhagen | 01:29:50 | |
| Nagl Bernhard | 2024 Vienna - European Championship | 01:29:54 | |
| Reade Donal | 2024 Madrid | 01:29:54 | |
| Sterritt Aaron | 2023 Glasgow | 01:30:13 | |
| Mehta Saagar | 2024 Paris | 01:30:28 | |
| Hogger Joey | 2024 London | 01:30:25 | |
| Perkins Matthew | 2022 Birmingham | 01:30:16 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
