Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Melbourne using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 932 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Underwood Chantelle's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Underwood Chantelle's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Underwood Chantelle's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Underwood Chantelle's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:04. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 01:51 | 41:52 to 40:01 | 30.5% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:29 | 06:03 to 04:34 | 24.5% |
| Wall Balls | 01:03 | 04:33 to 03:30 | 17.3% |
| Sled Pull | 00:38 | 05:05 to 04:27 | 10.4% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:37 | 04:24 to 03:47 | 10.2% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:26 | 02:17 to 01:51 | 7.1% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:16 to 04:16 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 01:42 to 01:42 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:47 to 04:47 | 0.0% |
| Underwood Chantelle | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:54 | 00:00 | 04:41 +00:13 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:16 | 04:54 | 04:55 -00:39 | 04:41 +00:13 |
| Running 2 | 04:51 | 09:10 | 05:00 -00:09 | 09:36 -00:26 |
| Sled Push | 01:42 | 14:01 | 02:28 -00:46 | 14:36 -00:35 |
| Running 3 | 05:09 | 15:43 | 05:16 -00:07 | 17:04 -01:21 |
| Sled Pull | 05:05 | 20:52 | 05:00 +00:05 | 22:20 -01:28 |
| Running 4 | 05:14 | 25:57 | 05:16 -00:02 | 27:20 -01:23 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:03 | 31:11 | 05:06 +00:57 | 32:36 -01:25 |
| Running 5 | 05:30 | 37:14 | 05:23 +00:07 | 37:42 -00:28 |
| Rowing | 04:47 | 42:44 | 05:08 -00:21 | 43:05 -00:21 |
| Running 6 | 05:25 | 47:31 | 05:18 +00:07 | 48:13 -00:42 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:17 | 52:56 | 02:03 +00:14 | 53:31 -00:35 |
| Running 7 | 05:15 | 55:13 | 05:16 -00:01 | 55:34 -00:21 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:24 | 01:00:28 | 04:10 +00:14 | 01:00:50 -00:22 |
| Running 8 | 05:37 | 01:04:52 | 05:32 +00:05 | 01:05:00 -00:08 |
| Wall Balls | 04:33 | 01:10:29 | 04:09 +00:24 | 01:10:32 -00:03 |
| Roxzone | 05:32 | 01:20:25 | 05:44 -00:12 | 01:20:25 |
Chantelle Underwood demonstrated a commendable performance at the 2024 Melbourne Hyrox race. Finishing with an overall rank of 125 out of 1801 athletes, she placed in the top 6%, which is an impressive achievement. In her age group (16-24), she ranked 17th out of 136, placing her in the top 12%. Her total running time was 00:41:52, 20 seconds faster than the average, indicating a strong running profile. However, her running splits suggest she may have started slightly slower, with Running 1 being 13 seconds slower than average, but she improved throughout the race. Chantelle exhibits a hybrid profile, excelling in both running and strength-based exercises, particularly evident in her Ski Erg and Sled Push performance.
By addressing these areas with targeted training and strategic race execution, Chantelle can significantly enhance her performance in future Hyrox events.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Sandelin Hanna | 2024 Stockholm | 01:20:03 | |
| Mcdonald Michelle | 2023 New York | 01:20:07 | |
| Hembrock Sarah | 2022 Bremen | 01:20:26 | |
| Luchesa Smith Aphra | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:20:46 | |
| Dalziel Amy | 2024 Manchester | 01:20:25 | |
| Braccini Zoé | 2024 Paris | 01:20:44 | |
| Su Serena | 2024 Berlin | 01:20:47 | |
| Ferran Fraga Mariam | 2023 Valencia | 01:20:34 | |
| Darcy Laura | 2024 Malaga | 01:20:51 | |
| Gran Justicia Marta | 2024 Madrid | 01:20:18 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
