Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Melbourne using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Umbers Tyler's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Umbers Tyler's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Umbers Tyler's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Umbers Tyler's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:08. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 03:08 | 39:55 to 36:47 | 61.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:10 | 05:06 to 03:56 | 22.7% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:23 | 02:06 to 01:43 | 7.5% |
| Wall Balls | 00:23 | 05:18 to 04:55 | 7.5% |
| Ski Erg | 00:04 | 04:13 to 04:09 | 1.3% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:07 to 02:07 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 03:28 to 03:28 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:14 to 04:14 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 03:11 to 03:11 | 0.0% |
| Umbers Tyler | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:32 | 00:00 | 04:13 +00:19 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:13 | 04:32 | 04:17 -00:04 | 04:13 +00:19 |
| Running 2 | 04:48 | 08:45 | 04:29 +00:19 | 08:30 +00:15 |
| Sled Push | 02:07 | 13:33 | 02:34 -00:27 | 12:59 +00:34 |
| Running 3 | 05:01 | 15:40 | 04:51 +00:10 | 15:33 +00:07 |
| Sled Pull | 03:28 | 20:41 | 04:16 -00:48 | 20:24 +00:17 |
| Running 4 | 05:04 | 24:09 | 04:49 +00:15 | 24:40 -00:31 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:06 | 29:13 | 04:25 +00:41 | 29:29 -00:16 |
| Running 5 | 05:05 | 34:19 | 04:56 +00:09 | 33:54 +00:25 |
| Rowing | 04:14 | 39:24 | 04:34 -00:20 | 38:50 +00:34 |
| Running 6 | 05:04 | 43:38 | 04:51 +00:13 | 43:24 +00:14 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:06 | 48:42 | 01:56 +00:10 | 48:15 +00:27 |
| Running 7 | 04:53 | 50:48 | 04:49 +00:04 | 50:11 +00:37 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:11 | 55:41 | 04:24 -01:13 | 55:00 +00:41 |
| Running 8 | 05:30 | 58:52 | 05:13 +00:17 | 59:24 -00:32 |
| Wall Balls | 05:18 | 01:04:22 | 05:28 -00:10 | 01:04:37 -00:15 |
| Roxzone | 06:04 | 01:15:38 | 05:33 +00:31 | 01:15:38 |
Tyler Umbers delivered a commendable performance in the 2024 Melbourne Hyrox race, securing an overall rank of 207 out of 1801 athletes, placing him in the top 11%. His rank in the 30-34 age group was 57 out of 406, showing a top 14% finish. Tyler's total running time was 00:39:55, which was 01:24 slower than average, indicating a slight area for improvement in his running proficiency. Despite this, his strength in the event was evident, particularly in segments like the Ski Erg, Sled Push, Sled Pull, Rowing, and Sandbag Lunges, where he performed significantly better than average. Tyler's pacing was consistent across the race, with no major drop-offs in the initial running segments, suggesting a strong and balanced start. Tyler's profile leans towards a hybrid athlete, with notable strength capabilities complemented by adequate running performance.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gutierrez Martin Jose Miguel | 2023 Bilbao | 01:15:50 | |
| Humphreys Robert | 2024 Birmingham | 01:15:34 | |
| Petters Gisbert | 2023 Stuttgart | 01:15:59 | |
| Mcculloch David | 2024 Madrid | 01:15:14 | |
| Semple Iain | 2024 Brisbane | 01:15:53 | |
| Jacobs Maxime | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:15:29 | |
| Alcachebury Johan | 2024 Marseille | 01:15:28 | |
| Carr Simon | 2023 London | 01:15:10 | |
| Fisher John | 2024 London | 01:16:00 | |
| Hoek Bert | 2021 Amsterdam | 01:15:34 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
