Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Melbourne using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We stack your running times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you measure up. This chart breaks it down, showing whether you were blazing fast, cruising steady, or losing pace.
It’s all about finding out if your running strategy matched your overall finish time!
We pit your station times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you stack up. This chart shows if you crushed it, coasted, or found that sweet spot for your overall finish time.
Here’s the full breakdown of the race, station by station and run by run, stacked against the average of athletes with similar finish times.
In HYROX, pacing is the name of the game. The pacing line shows where you hit the gas, tapped the brakes, or nailed it perfectly—guiding the way to a more balanced and dominant race strategy.
With the RoxCoach Simulation machine, you can see how your predicted finish time evolves as you power through your race. This next-level tech recalculates your estimated finish time after every run and every station. Crushing the sled pull? Gaining ground on the row? Or holding strong in the Wall Balls? RoxCoach tracks it all, giving you the inside scoop on where you shined and where there’s room to level up.
This chart breaks down the splits for every athlete in the division, giving you a clear look at how times are distributed across the pack.
Compare performance to the competition, spotting where they dominated and where there’s room to improve.
You’ll see how they stack up against the Top 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and beyond. Outliers are out—so the focus stays on the real competition.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve his time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:22. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 04:43 (From 49:45 to 45:02) | 74.1% |
| BBJ | 01:07 (From 06:55 to 05:48) | 17.5% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:32 (From 06:00 to 05:28) | 8.4% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 (From 04:13 to 04:13) | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 (From 02:25 to 02:25) | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 (From 03:57 to 03:57) | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 (From 04:48 to 04:48) | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 (From 02:09 to 02:09) | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 (From 05:17 to 05:17) | 0.0% |
| TrewinSmart Campbell | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:36 | 00:00 | 04:52 -00:16 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:13 | 04:36 | 04:33 -00:20 | 04:52 -00:16 |
| Running 2 | 05:09 | 08:49 | 05:18 -00:09 | 09:25 -00:36 |
| Sled Push | 02:25 | 13:58 | 03:10 -00:45 | 14:43 -00:45 |
| Running 3 | 05:47 | 16:23 | 05:47 +00:00 | 17:53 -01:30 |
| Sled Pull | 03:57 | 22:10 | 05:28 -01:31 | 23:40 -01:30 |
| Running 4 | 06:16 | 26:07 | 05:48 +00:28 | 29:08 -03:01 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:55 | 32:23 | 06:05 +00:50 | 34:56 -02:33 |
| Running 5 | 07:00 | 39:18 | 06:00 +01:00 | 41:01 -01:43 |
| Rowing | 04:48 | 46:18 | 04:59 -00:11 | 47:01 -00:43 |
| Running 6 | 06:23 | 51:06 | 05:49 +00:34 | 52:00 -00:54 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:09 | 57:29 | 02:21 -00:12 | 57:49 -00:20 |
| Running 7 | 06:22 | 59:38 | 05:48 +00:34 | 01:00:10 -00:32 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:00 | 01:06:00 | 05:42 +00:18 | 01:05:58 +00:02 |
| Running 8 | 08:15 | 01:12:00 | 06:37 +01:38 | 01:11:40 +00:20 |
| Wall Balls | 05:17 | 01:20:15 | 07:24 -02:07 | 01:18:17 +01:58 |
| Roxzone | 08:09 | 01:33:35 | 07:54 +00:15 | 01:33:35 |
Campbell TrewinSmart demonstrated a well-rounded performance in the 2024 Melbourne Hyrox event, finishing in the top 43% overall and top 41% within his age group. His strong points included impressive strength exercises like the Sled Push, Sled Pull, and Wall Balls, where he ranked among the top 5-13%. However, his running performance was below average, indicating that he has more of a strength-oriented profile. The total running time was 3:14 slower than average, suggesting a need for focused improvement in running endurance and speed. Notably, Campbell began the race strong but experienced a decline in running speed from Running 4 onwards, which suggests potential fatigue or pacing issues.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Noack Michael | 2021 Hamburg | 01:33:10 | |
| Gannon Christopher | 2024 Dublin | 01:33:47 | |
| Fellmoser Florian | 2022 Karlsruhe | 01:33:31 | |
| Dennis Harold Bush | 2023 Los Angeles | 01:33:27 | |
| Mesa Julian | 2019 Miami | 01:33:57 | |
| Ryan Simon | 2024 Birmingham | 01:33:16 | |
| Williams Chris | 2024 Dubai | 01:33:14 | |
| Ferretti Niccolo | 2023 Milan | 01:34:00 | |
| Ramirez Paolo | 2022 New York | 01:33:53 | |
| Viot Cédric | 2024 Bordeaux | 01:33:10 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
TrewinSmart Campbell
