Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Melbourne using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 447 similar athletes.
We stack your running times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you measure up. This chart breaks it down, showing whether you were blazing fast, cruising steady, or losing pace.
It’s all about finding out if your running strategy matched your overall finish time!
We pit your station times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you stack up. This chart shows if you crushed it, coasted, or found that sweet spot for your overall finish time.
Here’s the full breakdown of Thomas Marc's race, station by station and run by run, stacked against the average of athletes with similar finish times.
In HYROX, pacing is the name of the game. The pacing line shows where Thomas Marc hit the gas, tapped the brakes, or nailed it perfectly—guiding the way to a more balanced and dominant race strategy.
With the RoxCoach Simulation machine, you can see how your predicted finish time evolves as you power through your race. This next-level tech recalculates your estimated finish time after every run and every station. Crushing the sled pull? Gaining ground on the row? Or holding strong in the Wall Balls? RoxCoach tracks it all, giving you the inside scoop on where you shined and where there’s room to level up.
This chart breaks down the splits for every athlete in the division, giving you a clear look at how times are distributed across the pack.
Compare Thomas Marc’s performance to the competition, spotting where they dominated and where there’s room to improve.
You’ll see how they stack up against the Top 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and beyond. Outliers are out—so the focus stays on the real competition.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Thomas Marc's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:47. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 01:06 | 33:33 to 32:27 | 29.1% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:05 | 04:05 to 03:00 | 28.6% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:36 | 04:17 to 03:41 | 15.9% |
| Sled Pull | 00:27 | 04:45 to 04:18 | 11.9% |
| Ski Erg | 00:19 | 04:12 to 03:53 | 8.4% |
| Rowing | 00:10 | 04:20 to 04:10 | 4.4% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:04 | 01:41 to 01:37 | 1.8% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:35 to 02:35 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 04:28 to 04:28 | 0.0% |
| Thomas Marc | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:53 | 00:00 | 03:39 +00:14 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:12 | 03:53 | 04:00 +00:12 | 03:39 +00:14 |
| Running 2 | 04:04 | 08:05 | 03:57 +00:07 | 07:39 +00:26 |
| Sled Push | 02:35 | 12:09 | 03:03 -00:28 | 11:36 +00:33 |
| Running 3 | 04:23 | 14:44 | 04:15 +00:08 | 14:39 +00:05 |
| Sled Pull | 04:45 | 19:07 | 04:50 -00:05 | 18:54 +00:13 |
| Running 4 | 04:25 | 23:52 | 04:17 +00:08 | 23:44 +00:08 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:05 | 28:17 | 03:21 +00:44 | 28:01 +00:16 |
| Running 5 | 04:13 | 32:22 | 04:21 -00:08 | 31:22 +01:00 |
| Rowing | 04:20 | 36:35 | 04:15 +00:05 | 35:43 +00:52 |
| Running 6 | 04:04 | 40:55 | 04:18 -00:14 | 39:58 +00:57 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:41 | 44:59 | 01:48 -00:07 | 44:16 +00:43 |
| Running 7 | 04:13 | 46:40 | 04:21 -00:08 | 46:04 +00:36 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:17 | 50:53 | 04:01 +00:16 | 50:25 +00:28 |
| Running 8 | 04:21 | 55:10 | 04:36 -00:15 | 54:26 +00:44 |
| Wall Balls | 04:28 | 59:31 | 05:19 -00:51 | 59:02 +00:29 |
| Roxzone | 04:59 | 01:08:50 | 04:29 +00:30 | 01:08:50 |
Marc Thomas delivered an impressive performance at the 2024 Melbourne Hyrox event, securing an overall rank of 24, which places him in the top 12% of 194 athletes. Within his age group, he ranked 7th, marking him as a competitive contender among his peers. His total time was 01:08:50, showcasing strong capabilities in both running and strength-based segments. Notably, Marc's total running time was 00:33:33, which is 00:20 faster than the average, indicating a significant strength in running. His pacing strategy was well-managed, as he maintained consistency without starting too fast or too slow, allowing him to capitalize on his running strength without compromising his performance in strength events. Overall, Marc exhibits a hybrid athlete profile, excelling in running with commendable strength performance.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Campbell Ian | 2023 London | 01:09:09 | |
| Hendrie Charlie | 2024 Poznan | 01:08:28 | |
| Thomas Zach | 2023 Chicago | 01:09:20 | |
| Lippenmeyer Florian | 2023 Köln | 01:09:06 | |
| James Bradley | 2024 Birmingham | 01:08:47 | |
| Walker Scott | 2024 Marseille | 01:08:52 | |
| Ringwood Curtis | 2024 Birmingham | 01:09:07 | |
| Ulajew Dimitri | 2019 Leipzig | 01:09:07 | |
| Barton Kaleb | 2024 Brisbane | 01:09:00 | |
| Christensen Nikolaj | 2024 Copenhagen | 01:09:09 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Incheon | 01:10:34 | |
| 2024 Sydney | 01:08:15 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
