Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Melbourne using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Telford Rochelle's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Telford Rochelle's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Telford Rochelle's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Telford Rochelle's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:51. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:24 | 07:01 to 05:37 | 36.4% |
| Run Total | 01:07 | 45:35 to 44:28 | 29.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:58 | 05:26 to 04:28 | 25.1% |
| Sled Pull | 00:22 | 05:36 to 05:14 | 9.5% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:44 to 04:44 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:11 to 02:11 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:04 to 05:04 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:01 to 02:01 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 03:53 to 03:53 | 0.0% |
| Telford Rochelle | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:06 | 00:00 | 05:06 +00:00 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:44 | 05:06 | 05:05 -00:21 | 05:06 +00:00 |
| Running 2 | 05:28 | 09:50 | 05:26 +00:02 | 10:11 -00:21 |
| Sled Push | 02:11 | 15:18 | 02:40 -00:29 | 15:37 -00:19 |
| Running 3 | 05:35 | 17:29 | 05:43 -00:08 | 18:17 -00:48 |
| Sled Pull | 05:36 | 23:04 | 05:37 -00:01 | 24:00 -00:56 |
| Running 4 | 05:49 | 28:40 | 05:45 +00:04 | 29:37 -00:57 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:01 | 34:29 | 05:58 +01:03 | 35:22 -00:53 |
| Running 5 | 05:49 | 41:30 | 05:53 -00:04 | 41:20 +00:10 |
| Rowing | 05:04 | 47:19 | 05:20 -00:16 | 47:13 +00:06 |
| Running 6 | 05:54 | 52:23 | 05:47 +00:07 | 52:33 -00:10 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:01 | 58:17 | 02:14 -00:13 | 58:20 -00:03 |
| Running 7 | 05:57 | 01:00:18 | 05:45 +00:12 | 01:00:34 -00:16 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:26 | 01:06:15 | 04:41 +00:45 | 01:06:19 -00:04 |
| Running 8 | 06:00 | 01:11:41 | 06:07 -00:07 | 01:11:00 +00:41 |
| Wall Balls | 03:53 | 01:17:41 | 04:51 -00:58 | 01:17:07 +00:34 |
| Roxzone | 07:11 | 01:28:38 | 06:40 +00:31 | 01:28:38 |
Rochelle Telford delivered an impressive performance at the 2024 Melbourne Hyrox race, securing an overall rank of 286 out of 1801 athletes, placing her in the top 15%. Notably, she ranked 17th in her age group, positioning her in the top 13% of her category. Her total running time was 45:35, which is 40 seconds faster than the average, indicating a strong running capability. However, her pacing suggests a slightly conservative start in the first few running segments, as she only slightly lagged behind the average.
Overall, Rochelle exhibits a hybrid profile, excelling in both running and strength-based exercises. This balance is evident in her exceptional performance in the Ski Erg and Sled Push, where she outperformed the average significantly. However, there is room for improvement in specific strength-focused segments and transitions.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Matthews Betsy | 2023 London | 01:28:52 | |
| Troia Ramona | 2023 Milan | 01:28:37 | |
| Bomert Maud | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:28:30 | |
| De Wit Manon | 2024 Maastricht | 01:28:34 | |
| Verwijlen Pam | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:28:08 | |
| Struckholt Sonja | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:28:40 | |
| Pilgren Sautter Julia | 2023 Stockholm | 01:28:29 | |
| Impala Domi | 2024 Brisbane | 01:28:35 | |
| Mee Danielle | 2024 Melbourne | 01:28:16 | |
| Lange Dagmar | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:29:05 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Melbourne | 01:25:16 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
