Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Melbourne using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Ruddick Stuart's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Ruddick Stuart's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Ruddick Stuart's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Ruddick Stuart's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:46. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:38 | 47:29 to 44:51 | 55.2% |
| Sled Pull | 01:05 | 06:17 to 05:12 | 22.7% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:35 | 06:01 to 05:26 | 12.2% |
| Wall Balls | 00:21 | 07:16 to 06:55 | 7.3% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:07 | 05:52 to 05:45 | 2.4% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:18 to 04:18 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 01:43 to 01:43 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:51 to 04:51 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:09 to 02:09 | 0.0% |
| Ruddick Stuart | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:36 | 00:00 | 04:50 +00:46 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:18 | 05:36 | 04:33 -00:15 | 04:50 +00:46 |
| Running 2 | 05:22 | 09:54 | 05:19 +00:03 | 09:23 +00:31 |
| Sled Push | 01:43 | 15:16 | 03:08 -01:25 | 14:42 +00:34 |
| Running 3 | 05:20 | 16:59 | 05:46 -00:26 | 17:50 -00:51 |
| Sled Pull | 06:17 | 22:19 | 05:25 +00:52 | 23:36 -01:17 |
| Running 4 | 05:47 | 28:36 | 05:46 +00:01 | 29:01 -00:25 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:52 | 34:23 | 05:59 -00:07 | 34:47 -00:24 |
| Running 5 | 06:09 | 40:15 | 05:58 +00:11 | 40:46 -00:31 |
| Rowing | 04:51 | 46:24 | 04:58 -00:07 | 46:44 -00:20 |
| Running 6 | 05:57 | 51:15 | 05:49 +00:08 | 51:42 -00:27 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:09 | 57:12 | 02:22 -00:13 | 57:31 -00:19 |
| Running 7 | 06:00 | 59:21 | 05:47 +00:13 | 59:53 -00:32 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:01 | 01:05:21 | 05:37 +00:24 | 01:05:40 -00:19 |
| Running 8 | 07:22 | 01:11:22 | 06:35 +00:47 | 01:11:17 +00:05 |
| Wall Balls | 07:16 | 01:18:44 | 07:16 +00:00 | 01:17:52 +00:52 |
| Roxzone | 07:05 | 01:32:55 | 07:47 -00:42 | 01:32:55 |
Stuart Ruddick delivered a commendable performance at the 2024 Melbourne Hyrox event, ranking in the top 42% overall and in the top 46% within his age group. His total running time was slightly slower than average, indicating a need for improvement in this area. Notably, Stuart excelled in strength-based segments such as the Sled Push and Ski Erg, which suggests a strong strength profile. However, his running performance lagged behind, affirming the need to focus more on running to balance his hybrid capabilities.
In terms of pacing, Stuart started slower than average in the initial running segments but maintained a consistent pace throughout the race. This indicates he may benefit from a more aggressive start to gain a time advantage early on.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Spolverato Marco | 2023 Rimini | 01:32:41 | |
| Nilsson Tomas | 2024 Copenhagen | 01:32:33 | |
| Charalambous Terry | 2024 London | 01:33:23 | |
| Goadby Joshua | 2024 Malaga | 01:33:16 | |
| Purnell Tom | 2022 London | 01:33:06 | |
| Diskin Mike | 2023 Dublin | 01:33:19 | |
| Ertel Raimund | 2020 Hannover | 01:32:48 | |
| Hill Richard | 2023 London | 01:32:40 | |
| Suárez Ramos Pedrueza Carlos Iñaki | 2024 Mexico City | 01:32:26 | |
| Lowe Oliver | 2024 Manchester | 01:32:25 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
