Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Melbourne using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 397 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Ross Hannah's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Ross Hannah's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Ross Hannah's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Ross Hannah's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:58. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sled Pull | 01:43 | 05:38 to 03:55 | 43.3% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:01 | 04:53 to 03:52 | 25.6% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:43 | 04:03 to 03:20 | 18.1% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:19 | 01:59 to 01:40 | 8.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:08 | 01:57 to 01:49 | 3.4% |
| Rowing | 00:04 | 04:50 to 04:46 | 1.7% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:29 to 04:29 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 02:44 to 02:44 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 35:59 to 35:59 | 0.0% |
| Ross Hannah | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:10 | 00:00 | 04:13 -00:03 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:29 | 04:10 | 04:43 -00:14 | 04:13 -00:03 |
| Running 2 | 04:19 | 08:39 | 04:31 -00:12 | 08:56 -00:17 |
| Sled Push | 01:57 | 12:58 | 02:13 -00:16 | 13:27 -00:29 |
| Running 3 | 04:35 | 14:55 | 04:44 -00:09 | 15:40 -00:45 |
| Sled Pull | 05:38 | 19:30 | 04:22 +01:16 | 20:24 -00:54 |
| Running 4 | 04:35 | 25:08 | 04:43 -00:08 | 24:46 +00:22 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:53 | 29:43 | 04:10 +00:43 | 29:29 +00:14 |
| Running 5 | 04:42 | 34:36 | 04:49 -00:07 | 33:39 +00:57 |
| Rowing | 04:50 | 39:18 | 04:55 -00:05 | 38:28 +00:50 |
| Running 6 | 04:39 | 44:08 | 04:45 -00:06 | 43:23 +00:45 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:59 | 48:47 | 01:51 +00:08 | 48:08 +00:39 |
| Running 7 | 04:27 | 50:46 | 04:45 -00:18 | 49:59 +00:47 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:03 | 55:13 | 03:33 +00:30 | 54:44 +00:29 |
| Running 8 | 04:36 | 59:16 | 05:00 -00:24 | 58:17 +00:59 |
| Wall Balls | 02:44 | 01:03:52 | 03:30 -00:46 | 01:03:17 +00:35 |
| Roxzone | 05:04 | 01:11:32 | 04:45 +00:19 | 01:11:32 |
Hannah Ross delivered an impressive performance at the 2024 Melbourne Hyrox event, achieving an overall rank of 21st out of 1801 athletes, placing her in the top 1%. Within her age group (30-34), she excelled further, securing 4th place among 406 competitors. Her total time of 01:11:32 demonstrates her competitive edge.
Analyzing her total running time, Hannah clocked in at 00:35:59, which is 01:56 faster than the average, indicating a strong running profile. Her best running lap was 00:04:19. The data suggests that she has a hybrid profile with a stronger inclination towards running.
In terms of pacing, Hannah maintained consistency throughout the event, starting with a solid pace in the early running segments. Her performance across these initial runs suggests she neither started too fast nor too slow but maintained a strategic pace, which is crucial for endurance events like Hyrox.
By concentrating on these areas of improvement and implementing strategic training plans, Hannah can elevate her performance in future races, potentially achieving even higher rankings and personal bests.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Merk Dorit | 2024 Berlin | 01:11:44 | |
| Mcdonald Tara | 2024 London | 01:11:07 | |
| Street Megan | 2024 Copenhagen | 01:11:43 | |
| Bonardi Giada | 2024 Turin | 01:11:59 | |
| Hartl Natascha | 2019 Karlsruhe | 01:11:20 | |
| Stubenbordt Rebecca | 2024 Köln | 01:11:43 | |
| Pulfer Alexandra Alice | 2024 Karlsruhe | 01:11:09 | |
| Behle Liv | 2022 Frankfurt | 01:11:35 | |
| Hazell Joanne | 2024 Glasgow | 01:11:58 | |
| Biggs Maddison | 2024 Melbourne | 01:11:59 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Brisbane | 01:08:42 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
