Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Melbourne using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Risteski Zan's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Risteski Zan's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Risteski Zan's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Risteski Zan's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:53. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 01:12 | 36:06 to 34:54 | 30.9% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:00 | 04:41 to 03:41 | 25.8% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:43 | 04:14 to 03:31 | 18.5% |
| Wall Balls | 00:17 | 04:48 to 04:31 | 7.3% |
| Sled Push | 00:16 | 02:17 to 02:01 | 6.9% |
| Sled Pull | 00:13 | 03:44 to 03:31 | 5.6% |
| Ski Erg | 00:10 | 04:13 to 04:03 | 4.3% |
| Rowing | 00:02 | 04:23 to 04:21 | 0.9% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:31 to 01:31 | 0.0% |
| Risteski Zan | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:54 | 00:00 | 03:59 -00:05 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:13 | 03:54 | 04:12 +00:01 | 03:59 -00:05 |
| Running 2 | 04:13 | 08:07 | 04:16 -00:03 | 08:11 -00:04 |
| Sled Push | 02:17 | 12:20 | 02:27 -00:10 | 12:27 -00:07 |
| Running 3 | 04:27 | 14:37 | 04:34 -00:07 | 14:54 -00:17 |
| Sled Pull | 03:44 | 19:04 | 04:00 -00:16 | 19:28 -00:24 |
| Running 4 | 04:31 | 22:48 | 04:33 -00:02 | 23:28 -00:40 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:14 | 27:19 | 04:02 +00:12 | 28:01 -00:42 |
| Running 5 | 04:36 | 31:33 | 04:40 -00:04 | 32:03 -00:30 |
| Rowing | 04:23 | 36:09 | 04:29 -00:06 | 36:43 -00:34 |
| Running 6 | 04:35 | 40:32 | 04:34 +00:01 | 41:12 -00:40 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:31 | 45:07 | 01:49 -00:18 | 45:46 -00:39 |
| Running 7 | 04:37 | 46:38 | 04:34 +00:03 | 47:35 -00:57 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:41 | 51:15 | 04:02 +00:39 | 52:09 -00:54 |
| Running 8 | 05:15 | 55:56 | 04:53 +00:22 | 56:11 -00:15 |
| Wall Balls | 04:48 | 01:01:11 | 05:04 -00:16 | 01:01:04 +00:07 |
| Roxzone | 05:19 | 01:11:12 | 05:04 +00:15 | 01:11:12 |
Zan Risteski delivered a commendable performance during the 2024 Melbourne Hyrox race, securing an overall rank of 96, which places him in the top 5% of all 1801 competitors. Within his age group (35-39), Zan also achieved a top 5% position, ranking 21st out of 378 athletes. His overall time was 01:11:12, showcasing his strong running capabilities with a total running time of 00:36:06, which is 00:16 faster than the average, indicating a runner profile. Zan's performance in the initial running segments indicates a well-paced start, with his best lap at 00:04:13. However, his slower performance in the later running segments suggests room for pacing improvement to maintain speed throughout the race.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Strudwick Connor | 2024 London | 01:11:18 | |
| Samor Erik | 2024 Stockholm | 01:11:04 | |
| Sheerin Jordan | 2024 Glasgow | 01:11:21 | |
| Doyle Ronan | 2024 Dublin | 01:11:21 | |
| White Jake | 2023 Barcelona | 01:10:52 | |
| Paluch Eddy | 2022 Basel | 01:11:27 | |
| Klaasse Michel | 2024 Birmingham | 01:11:08 | |
| Culley Joshua | 2024 Birmingham | 01:11:25 | |
| Meek Andrew | 2024 Dublin | 01:11:14 | |
| Stamatiou Emmanuel | 2024 London | 01:11:13 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Melbourne | 01:29:16 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
