Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Dubai using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 827 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Paz Faye Anne's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Paz Faye Anne's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Paz Faye Anne's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Paz Faye Anne's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 07:10. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 06:28 | 56:45 to 50:17 | 90.2% |
| Sled Pull | 00:25 | 06:49 to 06:24 | 5.8% |
| Sled Push | 00:12 | 03:14 to 03:02 | 2.8% |
| Ski Erg | 00:04 | 05:23 to 05:19 | 0.9% |
| Rowing | 00:01 | 05:38 to 05:37 | 0.2% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 06:58 to 06:58 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:10 to 02:10 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:38 to 04:38 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 03:18 to 03:18 | 0.0% |
| Paz Faye Anne | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 06:46 | 00:00 | 05:37 +01:09 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:23 | 06:46 | 05:21 +00:02 | 05:37 +01:09 |
| Running 2 | 08:10 | 12:09 | 06:04 +02:06 | 10:58 +01:11 |
| Sled Push | 03:14 | 20:19 | 03:05 +00:09 | 17:02 +03:17 |
| Running 3 | 06:29 | 23:33 | 06:24 +00:05 | 20:07 +03:26 |
| Sled Pull | 06:49 | 30:02 | 06:35 +00:14 | 26:31 +03:31 |
| Running 4 | 07:03 | 36:51 | 06:27 +00:36 | 33:06 +03:45 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:58 | 43:54 | 07:22 -00:24 | 39:33 +04:21 |
| Running 5 | 07:05 | 50:52 | 06:39 +00:26 | 46:55 +03:57 |
| Rowing | 05:38 | 57:57 | 05:40 -00:02 | 53:34 +04:23 |
| Running 6 | 06:51 | 01:03:35 | 06:30 +00:21 | 59:14 +04:21 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:10 | 01:10:26 | 02:29 -00:19 | 01:05:44 +04:42 |
| Running 7 | 06:59 | 01:12:36 | 06:29 +00:30 | 01:08:13 +04:23 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:38 | 01:19:35 | 05:37 -00:59 | 01:14:42 +04:53 |
| Running 8 | 07:24 | 01:24:13 | 07:10 +00:14 | 01:20:19 +03:54 |
| Wall Balls | 03:18 | 01:31:37 | 05:59 -02:41 | 01:27:29 +04:08 |
| Roxzone | 06:56 | 01:41:45 | 08:17 -01:21 | 01:41:45 |
Pacing: Faye Anne Paz showed good pacing throughout the race, with consistent splits across most segments. However, there were a few segments where she lost time compared to the average, indicating potential areas for improvement.
Profile: Faye Anne Paz's total running time of 00:56:45 was 07:29 slower than the average. This suggests that she may benefit from focusing on improving her running performance. Additionally, her best running lap was 00:06:29, indicating a strength in shorter distance running.
Overall, Faye Anne Paz performed well in the Hyrox race, with a strong overall rank and top placement in her age group. By focusing on improving her running performance and implementing the suggested training strategies, she can further enhance her performance in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Thorburn Melinda | 2024 Melbourne | 01:41:45 | |
| Lai Sheung Wai Una | 2024 Hong Kong | 01:41:21 | |
| Wardlow Gabriella | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:41:53 | |
| Chabot Cathryn | 2019 New York | 01:41:31 | |
| Hall Vicki | 2023 Birmingham | 01:41:47 | |
| Tokarski Sabrina | 2019 Hannover | 01:42:08 | |
| Villegas Aponte Jacqueline | 2024 Fort Lauderdale | 01:41:35 | |
| Craig Diana | 2024 Berlin | 01:41:59 | |
| Hyams Kirsty | 2022 London | 01:42:10 | |
| Mäkelä Melina | 2024 Stockholm | 01:41:17 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
